PERSPECTIVES
Commentaries
Theoretically an option, but an enforcement nightmare
Correspondence to:
Luk Joossens, Advocacy Officer, Association of European Cancer Leagues, Brussels, Belgium; joossens@globalink.org
Received 13 November 2008
Accepted 13 November 2008
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Banning smoking could theoretically be an option if an alternative for addictive cigarettes would provide the same pleasure and glamour as cigarettes, if smoking rates are below 5% and if the countrys borders can be easily controlled. In November 2006, I visited Bhutan, the only country in the world that in December 2004 banned the sales of tobacco (but not yet smoking itself). For religious reasons, smoking prevalence in Bhutan was already very low. In addition, the country is almost isolated from the rest of the world—the perfect country for a smoking ban justified on health reasons. The ban resulted in a mixed picture. Tobacco products became more expensive and more difficult to obtain, but smoking also became trendier among youngsters (certainly in the discotheques) and smuggling is increasing. In the 27 countries of the European Union, we have almost open borders, smoking rates of around 20% to 35%
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
