PERSPECTIVES
Commentaries
"Our" tobacco industry "death-lihood" up in smoke? Dont dare dream it!
Correspondence to:
Anna White, Essential Action. Licensed to Kill, Inc, Virginia, USA; awhite@essential.org
Received 13 November 2008
Accepted 13 November 2008
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Richard Daynards suggestion that cigarettes be banned is hardly "unthinkable"—at least not to us in the tobacco industry. Weve witnessed the discouraging worldwide trends in tobacco control, despite our best attempts to thwart them, and see where they could one day lead: our livelihood—er, death-lihood up in smoke. Our death sticks may be lethal, but thankfully theyre still legal, and frankly, wed like to keep it that way. After all, we make quite a killing pushing those "dirty needles of nicotine delivery devices" around the world. It would be financial suicide—indeed, against our corporate DNA—for us to do otherwise. So we will fight "tooth and coffin nail" against any effort to make cancer puffs history, while hoping our adversaries dont dare dream about what they might still accomplish—perhaps not in the United States today, but somewhere in the future. Tobacco advertising bans? Case in point.
Competing interests: *As "channelled"
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
