Industry watch
Blowing smoke: how cigarette manufacturers argued that nicotine is not addictive
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
"We show that the FDA is wrong on key factual and scientific points. Our comments review the many flaws in and evidence contradicting the FDA's allegations regarding such matters as tobacco growing, cigarette manufacturing and addiction."
Steven Parrish, senior vice president, Philip Morris. 2 January 1996.1
Despite the release of secret documents showing that many tobacco
industry scientists and officials have long considered nicotine to be
addictive,2 some industry executives still insist that smoking is just a habit that should not be classified with other forms
of drug dependency.3 In April 1999, cigarette manufacturer Brown & Williamson unveiled a web site <www.brownandwilliamson.com> that contests the modern definition of addiction and argues that "the
issue should be whether consumers are aware that smoking may be
difficult to quit (which they are) and whether there is anything in
cigarette smoke that impairs smokers from reaching and implementing a
decision to quit (which we
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Waxman, H A
(2003). Tobacco industry statements in the US Department of Justice lawsuit. Tobacco Control
12: 94-101
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
