Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 1999;8:433-437; doi:10.1136/tc.8.4.433
Copyright © 1999 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Tob Control 1999;8:433-437 ( Winter )

Industry watch

The low tar lie

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

For perhaps the first time in history, the tobacco industry is having its own virulent smoke blown back in its face. Confronted with a continual onslaught of litigation, the nation's tobacco manufacturers are no longer able to cower behind the shelter of public relations and well nourished political connections. The industry's real history is now being told, but not in the sidestepping half truths that have characterised the industry's signature response to critical inquiry. This time, the story is told among millions of pages of once confidential industry documents made public through legal discovery. Rumours have become facts. Telltale is now truth. The tobacco industry is being forced to eat its own words.

One of the most compelling parts of this new history is the evolution of low tar and low nicotine cigarettes. While the tobacco industry publicly vowed to place the public's health above every other facet of its . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Anderson, S. J, Ling, P. M, Glantz, S. A (2007). Implications of the federal court order banning the terms "light" and "mild": what difference could it make?. Tobacco Control 16: 275-279 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Reed, M. B, Anderson, C. M, Burns, D. M (2006). The temporal relationship between advertising and sales of low-tar cigarettes. Tobacco Control 15: 436-441 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wayne, G. F. (2006). Potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) in industry trial testimony. Tobacco Control 15: iv90-iv97 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ling, P M, Glantz, S A (2005). Tobacco industry consumer research on socially acceptable cigarettes. Tobacco Control 14: e3-e3 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cummings, K M, Pollay, R W (2002). Exposing Mr Butts' tricks of the trade. Tobacco Control 11: i1-4 [Full Text]  
  • Cummings, K M, Morley, C P, Hyland, A (2002). Failed promises of the cigarette industry and its effect on consumer misperceptions about the health risks of smoking. Tobacco Control 11: i110-117 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • HENNINGFIELD, J. E, FAGERSTROM, K. O (2001). Swedish Match Company, Swedish snus and public health: a harm reduction experiment in progress?. Tobacco Control 10: 253-257 [Full Text]  
  • Bialous, S. A, Yach, D. (2001). Whose standard is it, anyway? How the tobacco industry determines the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards for tobacco and tobacco products. Tobacco Control 10: 96-104 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.