Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, D.
Topic Collections
Right arrow TC News analysis
Tobacco Control 2002;11:12
© 2002 Tobacco Control


News analysis

New ad code cosmetic: official

David Simpson

It's particularly disappointing when your traditional friends and admirers drop you in it, In fairness, however, a Wall Street analyst cannot have intended her memo about BAT's business prospects last year to be made public, but only to reassure stockholders. The analyst wrote that the new international marketing standards announced with much fanfare by BAT, Philip Morris, and Japan Tobacco were unlikely to affect the companies' profitability. In other words, the analyst rated then, in health terms, . . . worthless.

In words eerily reminiscent of a US Tobacco Institute document of 1983 which reassured readers that BAT's US subsidiary Brown & Williamson "will not support a youth smoking program which discourages young people from smoking", the Wall Street analyst dismissed the new code at a stroke. "We have analyzed the 9-page agreement and believe that the multinationals' strategy is proactive and is a way to improve their image," wrote Ms Bonnie Herzog of Credit Suisse First Boston Equity. "Also, by proactively setting new international standards," the briefing continued, "the multinationals could be trying to counter a number of proposals that the WHO has been working on to curb the amount of cigarettes that are consumed on an international level."

The refreshingly realistic and un-stuffy analysis, which might have been written specially for this column, added that in many countries existing laws are stricter than the provisions of the international marketing standards; and that Credit Suisse believed the "modest amount the multinationals actually spend on these types of practices will be redirected into other types of marketing promotions [such as] point of sale activity."


This picture from a newspaper in Mauritius offers a classic illustration of highly focused efforts to buy favour from a developing country government, presumably to reduce any risk of effective tobacco control action. BAT recently awarded educational bursaries to these 10 students from economically deprived areas.





This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, D.
Topic Collections
Right arrow TC News analysis


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.