Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 April 2008

Tob Control. Published Online First: 26 February 2008. doi:10.1136/tc.2007.022046
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
tc.2007.022046v1
17/2/93    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feighery, E. C
Right arrow Articles by Unger, J. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feighery, E. C
Right arrow Articles by Unger, J. B

RESEARCH PAPERS

An examination of trends in amount and type of cigarette advertising and sales promotions in California stores, 2002-2005

Ellen C Feighery1,3, Nina C Schleicher1, Tess Boley Cruz2, Jennifer B Unger2

1 Public Health Institute, United States;
2 University of Southern California, United States


ABSTRACT
Objective: Cigarette companies spend more of their marketing dollars in stores than in any other venue. In 2005, they spent 88 percent of $13.1 billion to advertise and promote product sales in stores. Study purposes were to identify how the amount and types of cigarette advertising and sales promotions have changed in California stores between 2002 and 2005, and to assess neighbourhood influences on cigarette marketing in stores.

Methods: Four observational assessments of cigarette advertising were conducted in approximately 600 California stores that sold cigarettes from 2002 to 2005. Trained observers collected data on the amount and type of cigarette advertising including signs, product shelving and displays and functional items, and presence of sales promotions on these items. Longitudinal analyses were performed to estimate trends over time and identify correlates of change in the amount and type of tobacco advertising.

Results: The mean number of cigarette ads per store increased significantly over time from 22.7 to 24.9. The percent of stores with at least one ad for a sales promotion increased from 68 percent to 80 percent. The amount of advertising and proportion with sales promotions increased more rapidly in stores situated in neighbourhoods with a higher proportion of African Americans.

Conclusion: The results indicate increasing use of stores to market and promote cigarette sales. Further, these increases are disproportionately accelerating in neighbourhoods with more African Americans. Legislative strategies should be pursued to control the marketing of tobacco products and promotional strategies used to reduce prices in stores.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.