RESEARCH PAPERS

Quitting Cigarettes Completely or Switching to Smokeless: Do U.S. Data Replicate the Swedish Results?

Shu-Hong Zhu¹, Julie B Wang¹, Anne Hartman², Yuerong Zhuang¹, Anthony Gamst¹, James T Gibson³, Hans Gilljam⁴, Maria Rosaria Galanti⁴

¹ University of California, San Diego, United States;
² National Cancer Institute, United States;
³ Information Management Services, United States;
⁴ Karolinska Institutet, United States

E-mail: szhu{at}ucsd.edu

Background: Swedish male smokers are likelier than female smokers to switch to smokeless tobacco (snus) and males’ smoking cessation rate is higher than females’. These results have fueled international debate over promoting smokeless tobacco for harm reduction. This study examines whether similar results emerge in the U.S., one of few other western countries where smokeless tobacco has long been widely available.

Methods: U.S data source: national sample in Tobacco Use Supplement to Current Population Survey, 2002, with 1-year follow-up in 2003. Analyses included adult self-respondents in this longitudinal sample (N=15,056). Population-weighted rates of quitting smoking and switching to smokeless tobacco were computed for the 1-year period.

Results: Among U.S. men, few current smokers switched to smokeless tobacco (0.3% in 12 months). Few former smokers turned to smokeless tobacco (1.7%). Switching between cigarettes and smokeless, infrequent among current tobacco users (<4%), was more often from smokeless to smoking. Men’s quit rate for smokeless tobacco was three times higher than for cigarettes (38.8% vs. 11.6%, p<0.001). Overall, U.S. men have no advantage over women in quitting smoking (11.7% vs. 12.4%, p=0.65), even though men are far likelier to use smokeless tobacco.

Conclusion: The Swedish results are not replicated in the U.S. Both male and female U.S. smokers appear to have higher quit rates for smoking than have their Swedish counterparts, despite greater use of smokeless tobacco in Sweden. Promoting smokeless tobacco for harm reduction in countries with ongoing tobacco control programs may not result in any positive population effect on smoking cessation.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Rogers, J. D., Biener, L., Clark, P. I. (2009). Test marketing of new smokeless tobacco products in four U.S. cities. Nicotine Tob Res 0: ntp166v1-ntp166 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wilson, N., Borland, R., Weerasekera, D., Edwards, R., Russell, M. (2009). Smoker interest in lower harm alternatives to cigarettes: National survey data. Nicotine Tob Res 0: ntp152v1-ntp152 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Promoting Snus Will Save Lives in the USA

Joel L Nitzkin, et al.

Tobacco Control Online, 6 Feb 2009 [Full text]

Response to Nitskin and Rodu's Comments

Shu-Hong Zhu, et al.

Tobacco Control Online, 11 Feb 2009 [Full text]

Evidence From Zhu et al. That American Smokers Have Switched to Smokeless Tobacco

Brad Rodu

Tobacco Control Online, 20 Feb 2009 [Full text]

Response to Zhu et al. (1, 2)

Paul Bergen, et al.

Tobacco Control Online, 20 Feb 2009 [Full text]

Response to Rodu’s and Bergen & Phillips’ Comments

Shu-Hong Zhu

Tobacco Control Online, 24 Feb 2009 [Full text]

Response to Zhu February 24 e-letter

Joel L Nitzkin

Tobacco Control Online, 24 Mar 2009 [Full text]

Response to Nitzkin March 24 eletter

Shu-Hong Zhu

Tobacco Control Online, 25 Mar 2009 [Full text]

Potential utility of switching to smokeless tobacco

Lars M Ramstrom

Tobacco Control Online, 18 Jun 2009 [Full text]

Response to Ramstrom

Shu-Hong Zhu

Tobacco Control Online, 29 Jul 2009 [Full text]

Re: Response to Ramstrom

Lars M Ramstrom

Tobacco Control Online, 24 Aug 2009 [Full text]