Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

To SUBMIT an e-letter please go to the abstract/full text of the article and click the 'Submit a response' link in the box to the right of the text. For further help click here.

Electronic Letters to:

Industry watch:
Suzaynn F Schick and Stanton A Glantz
Old ways, new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientists since the Master Settlement Agreement
Tob Control 2007; 16: 157-164 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read eLetter] ERRATUM for “Old ways, new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientist
Suzaynn F Schick, Stanton A. Glantz, Ph.D.   (13 September 2007)

ERRATUM for “Old ways, new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientist 13 September 2007
  Top
Suzaynn F Schick,
Professor
UCSF,
Stanton A. Glantz, Ph.D.

Send letter to journal:
Re: ERRATUM for “Old ways, new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientist

sschick{at}medsfgh.ucsf.edu Suzaynn F Schick, et al.

The published paper (p. 158) says "From 2002 to 2004, the IFSH granted US$3.9 million to academic scientists studying biomarkers of tobacco-smoke exposure and harm, tobacco harm reduction and toxicity of tobacco constituents”. The correct number for this time period is $2.9 million. As of August, 2007 the nonprofit Institute for Science and Health had spent US$3.83 million on tobacco industry funded research and US$120,000 on all other research programs.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.