Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
To SUBMIT an e-letter please go to the abstract/full text of the article and click the 'Submit a response' link in the box to the right of the text. For further help click here.

Electronic Letters to:

S Chapman, B Freeman
Markers of the denormalisation of smoking and the tobacco industry
Tob Control 2008; 17: 25-31 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read eLetter] Error in Abstract Layout
Simon Chapman, Becky Freeman   (28 January 2008)
[Read eLetter] We all did not go quietly
Jill McDonald   (18 March 2008)
[Read eLetter] Australian government excludes tobacco industry from routine consultation
Simon Chapman   (26 October 2008)

Error in Abstract Layout 28 January 2008
 Next eLetter Top
Simon Chapman,
Professor of Public Health
University of Sydney,
Becky Freeman

Send letter to journal:
Re: Error in Abstract Layout

sc{at}med.usyd.edu.au Simon Chapman, et al.

Readers of our paper Markers of the Denormalisation of Smoking and the Tobacco Industry may be perplexed about the way the Abstract is structured with the traditional Background, Methods, Results and Conclusion headings. These headings were inserted during the editing process after we as authors had approved the proofs of the paper. The paper we approved had an unstructured abstract as was appropriate to a paper of this sort.

We do not believe the error warrants a formal correction, but wanted readers to understand how the oddity occurred.

We all did not go quietly 18 March 2008
Previous eLetter Next eLetter Top
Jill McDonald,
Project Officer

Send letter to journal:
Re: We all did not go quietly

jmcdonald{at}durri.org.au Jill McDonald

Dear Simon and Becky, As a fellow advocate of non smoking I would like to congratulate you on the Article: Markers of the demormalisation of smoking and the tobacco industry. I note with interest your comments under the heading Smoking rooms at airports. You note "In early 2007, these uninviting rooms were quietly removed from Australian airports...." The Darwin International Airport still provides a room for the (many) smokers in the NT. The room conveniently opens directly on to the airport waiting lounge, provides seating and a "view". Each time the door is opened, a great waft of smoke-laden air rushes into the waiting area for the rest of the potential passengers and visitors to inhale; and waiting times can be long in Darwin with many of us waiting for 2am and later flights. Now we know the Northern Territory is different to the rest of Australia! We also have a large group of smokers, and the indigenous territorians smoke at high levels, in some communties 72% of all adults. The Darwin Airport has not quietly removed the smoking room. Yes we are different! Regards JMcDonald Public Health Project Officer Northern Territory Australia

Australian government excludes tobacco industry from routine consultation 26 October 2008
Previous eLetter  Top
Simon Chapman,
Professor of Public Health
University of Sydney

Send letter to journal:
Re: Australian government excludes tobacco industry from routine consultation

sc{at}med.usyd.edu.au Simon Chapman

An important new marker of the denormalisation of the tobacco industry has occurred in Australia in 2008. It is traditional – indeed usually mandatory -- for industries which may be affected by proposed changes in government policy or legislation to be fully consulted through formal processes prior to any changes taking place. In 2008, the Australian government established a Preventative (sic) Health Task Force, with several key sub-committees, to examine ways that Australia could more effectively prevent its major causes of chronic disease. The Task Force’s chief mission was to “provide a blueprint for tackling the burden of chronic disease currently caused by obesity, tobacco, and excessive consumption of alcohol. It will be directed at primary prevention and will address all relevant arms of policy and all available points of leverage, in both the health and non-health sectors, in formulating its recommendations.” The group’s report on tobacco control has now been published (see http://www.preventativehealth.org.au/internet/preventativehealth/publishing.nsf/Content/tech -tobacco).

The terms of reference for the Task Force included a requirement to obtain “Input from the food, alcohol and medicines industries, from stakeholders in these industries”. Significantly, no such requirement was mandated for consultation with the tobacco industry.

This omission would appear to indicate that the Australian government sees no merit in consulting with the tobacco industry when it comes to preventing health problems. The local industry has often made overtures to governments, including statements that it supports all platforms of tobacco control [1]. The exclusion of the tobacco industry from routine forms of consultation would seem to be yet another example of its ever- spiralling pariah status in the community.

References

1. Davies D (Philip Morris) Speech to National Press Club Canberra 2005 http://tobacco.health.usyd.edu.au/site/supersite/resources/pdfs/DDavies_%20HR_%202005.pdf