rss
Tob Control 10:i24-i32 doi:10.1136/tc.10.suppl_1.i24
  • Original article

Effect of health messages about “Light” and “Ultra Light” cigarettes on beliefs and quitting intent

Table 3

Mean (SE) “quit index” change by moderators

Feel Vents Health
Years smoked3-150
 < 20 0.26 −0.06 0.05
  p < 0.0253-151 (0.06) (0.06) (0.04)
 ⩾ 20 0.03 −0.05 0.00
(0.03) (0.04) (0.03)
Sex
 Male 0.07 −0.05 0.04
  p < 0.08 (0.05) (0.05) (0.04)
 Female 0.23 −0.06 0.01
(0.05) (0.04) (0.04)
Ethnicity
 Caucasian 0.12 −0.04 0.02
  NS (0.04) (0.03) (0.03)
 Non-caucasian 0.25 −0.08 0.02
(0.10) (0.12) (0.07)
Initial “quit index” score3-152
 < 4 0.41 0.09 0.16
  p < 0.005 (0.07) (0.04) (0.05)
 ⩾ 4 −0.08 −0.12 −0.03
(0.03) (0.04) (0.03)
Sensation belief3-153
 ⩽ 3 0.02 −0.09 0.03
  p < 0.03 (0.04) (0.04) (0.05)
 > 3 0.24 −0.02 0.02
(0.06) (0.06) (0.03)
Sensory factors as reason for smoking L/ULs3-154
 Endorse 0.35 −0.04 0.06
  NS (0.10) (0.06) (0.04)
 Non−endorse 0.10 −0.02 −0.02
(0.05) (0.05) (0.06)
Delivery
 ⩽ 3 0.12 −0.13 −0.03
  NS (0.05) (0.06) (0.03)
 > 3 0.17 0.01 0.07
(0.06) (0.04) (0.04)
  • 3-150 Median split.

  • 3-151 p Values indicate the test of the interaction between message and moderator.

  • 3-152 Subjects with an initial score of 6 on the “quit index” were removed from the analysis, since they could not increase their scores.

  • 3-153 Differences among messages are only significant among those who initially expressed belief in sensory benefits of L/ULs (p < 0.0001), and not among those who did not (p < 0.50).

  • 3-154 Assessed only among smokers of L/UL brands.

This Article

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Tobacco Control.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.