rss
Tob Control 2004;13:180-185 doi:10.1136/tc.2003.004804
  • Research paper

Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and determinants of support for complete smoking bans in psychiatric settings

  1. M C Willemsen1,
  2. C A Görts2,
  3. P Van Soelen1,
  4. R Jonkers2,
  5. S R Hilberink3
  1. 1STIVORO—for a smoke free future, The Hague, The Netherlands
  2. 2Rescon Research and Consultancy, Haarlem, The Netherlands
  3. 3Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr M C Willemsen
 STIVORO—for a smoke free future, PO Box 16070, 2500 BB The Hague, The Netherlands; mwillemsenstivoro.nl
  • Received 4 June 2003
  • Accepted 28 January 2004

Abstract

Objective: To measure environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure in psychiatric settings and to assess determinants of support for complete smoking bans.

Design: Cross sectional study

Setting: Dutch psychiatric hospitals, outpatient care institutions, and sheltered home facilities.

Subjects: A random sample of 540 treatment staff, 306 attendants/nurses, and 93 patients.

Main outcome measures: Self reported ETS exposure, current smoking policy, compliance with smoking policy, beliefs about smoking bans.

Results: 87% of respondents were exposed to tobacco smoke in psychiatric institutions; 29% said that on an average day they were exposed to “a lot of smoke”. Although ETS originates mainly from smoking patients, both non-compliance from patients and employees with existing bans resulted in non-smokers being exposed to ETS. Due to non-compliance, ETS exposure was quite high when there is a general smoking ban (designated areas option). Only with a complete ban was compliance good and employees sufficiently protected from ETS exposure. Psychiatrists, psychologists, physicians, attendants, and nurses were most concerned about resistance from patients, partly because of the fear of infringing on patients’ freedom to smoke.

Conclusions: Complete smoking bans are the only way to fully protect those working in psychiatry from ETS exposure, mainly because general smoking bans are not sufficiently complied with. Communication strategies to improve compliance with complete bans are crucial to protect those working in psychiatry from ETS. Compliance could be improved by addressing the belief that the ban will effectively result in less ETS exposure and the issue of patients’ freedom to smoke versus employees’ right to work in a smoke-free environment.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register hereto access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alertsso you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.