rss
Tob Control 14:255-261 doi:10.1136/tc.2005.011577
  • Research paper

Do u smoke after txt? Results of a randomised trial of smoking cessation using mobile phone text messaging

  1. A Rodgers1,
  2. T Corbett2,
  3. D Bramley3,
  4. T Riddell4,
  5. M Wills1,
  6. R-B Lin1,
  7. M Jones1
  1. 1Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  2. 2Social & Community Health, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland
  3. 3Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland
  4. 4Maori and Pacific Health, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Anthony Rodgers
 Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand; a.rodgersctru.auckland.ac.nz
  • Received 14 February 2005
  • Accepted 5 May 2005

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of a mobile phone text messaging smoking cessation programme.

Design: Randomised controlled trial

Setting: New Zealand

Participants: 1705 smokers from throughout New Zealand who wanted to quit, were aged over 15 years, and owned a mobile phone were randomised to an intervention group that received regular, personalised text messages providing smoking cessation advice, support, and distraction, or to a control group. All participants received a free month of text messaging; starting for the intervention group on their quit day to assist with quitting, and starting for the control group at six months to encourage follow up. Follow up data were available for 1624 (95%) at six weeks and 1265 (74%) at six months.

Main outcome measures: The main trial outcome was current non-smoking (that is, not smoking in the past week) six weeks after randomisation. Secondary outcomes included current non-smoking at 12 and 26 weeks.

Results: More participants had quit at six weeks in the intervention compared to the control group: 239 (28%) v 109 (13%), relative risk 2.20 (95% confidence interval 1.79 to 2.70), p < 0.0001. This treatment effect was consistent across subgroups defined by age, sex, income level, or geographic location (p homogeneity > 0.2). The relative risk estimates were similar in sensitivity analyses adjusting for missing data and salivary cotinine verification tests. Reported quit rates remained high at six months, but there was some uncertainty about between group differences because of incomplete follow up.

Conclusions: This programme offers potential for a new way to help young smokers to quit, being affordable, personalised, age appropriate, and not location dependent. Future research should test these findings in different settings, and provide further assessment of long term quit rates.

Footnotes

  • Sponsor details: The trial was funded by the National Heart Foundation of New Zealand, the Cancer Society of New Zealand, Vodafone NZ and Alcatel. The trial was designed, conducted and analysed by the researchers independently of the funders.

  • Competing interests: All authors declare that the answer to the questions on your competing interest form [http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/317/7154/291/DC1] are all No and therefore have nothing to declare. None of the investigators have a personal financial interest in the software or intellectual property developed as part of this trial. A not-for-profit entity, wholly owned by the University of Auckland, owns the software and intellectual property developed for the trial.

  • Details of ethical approval: The trial was approved by Auckland Ethics Committee, Reference number 2001/275

    International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN85788039

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Tobacco Control.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.


This insightful video is produced by Cancer Research UK

Navigate This Article