Article Text

PDF
Tobacco industry litigation strategies to oppose tobacco control media campaigns
  1. J K Ibrahim*,
  2. Stanton A Glantz
  1. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Stanton A Glantz
 PhD, Box 1390, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-1390, USA; glantz{at}medicine.ucsf.edu

Abstract

Objective: To document the tobacco industry’s litigation strategy to impede tobacco control media campaigns.

Methods: Data were collected from news and reports, tobacco industry documents, and interviews with health advocates and media campaign staff.

Results: RJ Reynolds and Lorillard attempted to halt California’s Media Campaign alleging that the campaign polluted jury pools and violated First Amendment rights because they were compelled to pay for anti-industry ads. The American Legacy Foundation was accused of violating the Master Settlement Agreement’s vilification clause because its ads attacked the tobacco industry. The tobacco companies lost these legal challenges.

Conclusion: The tobacco industry has expanded its efforts to oppose tobacco control media campaigns through litigation strategies. While litigation is a part of tobacco industry business, it imposes a financial burden and impediment to media campaigns’ productivity. Tobacco control professionals need to anticipate these challenges and be prepared to defend against them.

  • advertising
  • public policy
  • youth smoking prevention

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • * Current address: Assistant Professor of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA

  • Conflict of interest: Nothing to disclose.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.