Tob Control 15:69 doi:10.1136/tc.2005.014498
  • Letter

Authors’ response to M R Pakko

  1. B Alamar,
  2. S Glantz
  1. University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 S Glantz

    Pakko1 takes issue with our paper “Smoke-free law did not affect revenue from gaming in Delaware,”2,3 arguing that our methods were not sufficient because we failed to control for serial correlation and used a method of controlling for heteroskedasticity that did not meet his approval. We found these concerns odd, since in his original analysis claiming that there were negative effects of the Delaware law (published on the internet as …

    Free sample

    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Tobacco Control.
    View free sample issue >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

    This insightful video is produced by Cancer Research UK

    Navigate This Article