rss
Tob Control 2006;15:83-89 doi:10.1136/tc.2003.007237
  • Research paper

Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: results for 12–13 year olds from six European countries from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach study

  1. H de Vries1,
  2. M Candel2,
  3. R Engels3,
  4. L Mercken1
  1. 1Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Methodology and Statistics, University of Maastricht
  3. 3Department of Pedagogics, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor Hein de Vries
 Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, University of Maastricht, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; hein.devries{at}gvo.unimaas.nl
  • Received 17 December 2003
  • Accepted 10 January 2006

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether smoking onset in young adolescents is predicted by peer or parental smoking.

Design: Longitudinal design with one pretest and one follow-up at 12 months.

Setting: Schools in Finland, Denmark, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Spain and Portugal.

Participants: 7102 randomly selected adolescents from six countries. Mean age was 12.78 years.

Main outcome measures: Smoking behaviour of adolescents, peers and parents.

Results: No support was found for peer smoking as an important predictor of smoking onset in most countries. Support was found for the selection paradigm, implying that adolescents choose friends with similar smoking behaviour. Support for the impact of parents on adolescent behaviour and the choice of friends was also found.

Conclusions: Smoking uptake in this age cohort may be more strongly influenced by personal and parental influences than initially believed. Hence, social inoculation programmes teaching youngsters to resist the pressures to smoke may be less appropriate if youngsters have a positive attitude towards smoking, associate smoking with various advantages and look for peers with similar values. For this group attitudes towards smoking may thus guide future friend selection.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none declared

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register hereto access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alertsso you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.