rss
Tob Control 2007;16:66-68 doi:10.1136/tc.2006.017012
  • Brief report

Economic effect of a smoke-free law in a tobacco-growing community

  1. Mark K Pyles1,
  2. Donald J Mullineaux2,
  3. Chizimuzo T C Okoli3,
  4. Ellen J Hahn4
  1. 1School of Business and Economics, College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
  2. 2School of Management, Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Lexington, Kentucky, USA
  3. 3Lexus Group, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
  4. 4University of Kentucky, College of Nursing and College of Public Health, Lexington, Keutucky, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr M Pyles
 School of Business and Economics, College of Charleston, 5 Liberty Street, Suite 400, Charleston SC 29401, USA; pylesm{at}cofc.edu
  • Received 21 April 2006
  • Revised 11 September 2006

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether Lexington, Kentucky’s smoke-free law affected employment and business closures in restaurants and bars. On 27 April 2004, Lexington-Fayette County implemented a comprehensive ordinance prohibiting smoking in all public buildings, including bars and restaurants. Lexington is located in a major tobacco-growing state that has the highest smoking rate in the US and was the first Kentucky community to become smoke-free.

Design: A fixed-effects time series design to estimate the effect of the smoke-free law on employment and ordinary least squares to estimate the effect on business openings and closings.

Subjects and settings: All restaurants and bars in Lexington-Fayette County, Kentucky and the six contiguous counties.

Main outcome measures: ES-202 employment data from the Kentucky Workforce Cabinet; Business opening/closings data from the Lexington-Fayette County Health Department, Environmental Division.

Results: A positive and significant relationship was observed between the smoke-free legislation and restaurant employment, but no significant relationship was observed with bar employment. No relationship was observed between the law’s implementation and employment in contiguous counties nor between the smoke-free law and business openings or closures in alcohol-serving and or non-alcohol-serving businesses.

Conclusions: No important economic harm stemmed from the smoke-free legislation over the period studied, despite the fact that Lexington is located in a tobacco-producing state with higher-than-average smoking rates.

Footnotes

  • Funding: This study was funded by the University of Kentucky Research Program.

  • Competing interests: None declared.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register hereto access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alertsso you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.