Article Text

PDF
Criteria for evaluating tobacco control research funding programs and their application to models that include financial support from the tobacco industry
  1. J E Cohen1,2,
  2. M Zeller3,
  3. T Eissenberg4,
  4. M Parascandola5,
  5. R O’Keefe6,
  6. L Planinac1,
  7. S Leischow7
  1. 1
    Ontario Tobacco Research Unit, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2
    University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  3. 3
    Pinney Associates, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
  4. 4
    Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
  5. 5
    National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
  6. 6
    Health Effects Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  7. 7
    University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
  1. J E Cohen, University of Toronto, 33 Russell Street, T5, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2S1; Joanna_cohen{at}camh.net

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Much has been discussed and written about the purposes, outcomes and ethics related to tobacco industry funding of research.19 The issue is controversial because of tobacco industry funding mechanisms that have been used by the tobacco industry to gain credibility and to advance the industry’s interests, which may come at the expense of public health;6 at the same time others have argued that, given the scarcity of funding from other sources, tobacco industry support may be defensible, at least under some circumstances.10 These concerns raise the question of whether there could be a model of tobacco company funding that would be acceptable to the tobacco control research community. This paper presents a set of criteria for evaluating funding models and applies them to four diverse models.

While tobacco consumption and prevalence rates have declined in many developed countries over the past 40 years, the projections are that worldwide tobacco-related deaths will increase in the 21st century.11 Despite the disproportionate toll tobacco use takes, there remains only a modest investment in research to better understand tobacco products, tobacco product marketing, addiction, treatment and consumer behaviour. For example, in the USA, where tobacco causes almost 30% of all cancer deaths, only 2.3% of the National Cancer Institute’s 2003 budget was spent on tobacco-related research funding.12 This level of research investment is inadequate relative to the magnitude of the damage caused by tobacco use.13 14

At the same time, the tobacco industry has funded tobacco and health related research at universities. In the current context of limited funding, individuals and institutions may welcome additional sources of support. However the evidence is now clear that the tobacco industry participated in a long-standing conspiracy to defraud the public regarding the health risks of smoking. In 2006, the …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.