Educational inequalities in smoking cessation trends in Italy, 1982–2002
- 1Department of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Cassino, Italy
- 2Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- 3Department of Public Health and Microbiology, University of Turin, Italy
- 4Institute of Hygiene, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
- Correspondence to Dr Bruno Federico, Viale Bonomi snc 03043 Cassino, Italy;
- Received 18 December 2008
- Accepted 30 June 2009
- Published Online First 16 July 2009
Background/aim: Smoking prevalence rates are declining in most industrialised countries, partly because of growing cessation rates. However, little is known on recent time-trends in smoking cessation by socioeconomic position. This study aims to estimate educational inequalities in smoking cessation trends in Italy between 1982 and 2002.
Methods: Data were derived from two national health interview surveys carried out in Italy in 1999–2000 (n = 34 789) and in 2004–2005 (n = 33 135). On the basis of respondents’ age at starting and age at quitting smoking, we computed age-standardised smoking cessation rates at ages 20–44 years for subjects who were current smokers between 1982 and 2002.
Results: Smoking quit rates were approximately constant at a figure of about 2 per 100 person-years until the period 2000–2002, when they rapidly increased up to 3–4 per 100 person-years. Higher educated smokers constantly showed higher cessation rates than lower educated subjects (rate ratio 1.33; 95% CI 1.25 to 1.41 for men and 1.41; 95% CI 1.30 to 1.53 for women). The relative size of educational difference in smoking cessation did not significantly vary by period. However, in absolute terms, the increase in cessation rates in 2000–2002 was larger among higher educated smokers.
Conclusion: Educational inequalities in smoking cessation persisted in both relative and absolute terms. The increase in smoking cessation rates in 2000–2002 suggests that tobacco control policies may have reached more disadvantaged smokers, although smokers of higher socioeconomic groups seem to have benefited the most.
Funding This study was funded by the European Commission through the European Network for Smoking Prevention (project ENSP SPC.2002411).
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.