Article Text

PDF
Estimating missed government tax revenue from foreign tobacco: survey of discarded cigarette packs
  1. N Wilson,
  2. G Thomson,
  3. R Edwards,
  4. J Peace
  1. Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
  1. Correspondence to Dr N Wilson, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, New Zealand; nick.wilson{at}otago.ac.nz

Abstract

Aim: To clarify the extent of use of foreign (including duty free, foreign normal retail and smuggled) tobacco, and to estimate missed government tax revenue in a geographically isolated country.

Methods: Discarded cigarette packs were collected on the streets of four cities and six New Zealand towns/rural locations between November 2008 and January 2009.

Results: Out of a total of 1310 packs collected, 42 foreign packs were identified (3.2%, 95% CI 2.4% to 4.3%). Overall, the distribution of packs by country and company was not suggestive of any clustering that might indicate smuggling. At 3.2% of packs being “foreign”, the New Zealand government is losing around $36 million per year in tobacco-related tax relative to if all this tobacco was purchased in New Zealand. For various reasons (including that it was not possible to identify packs bought duty free within New Zealand, and other New Zealand survey data indicating duty free product use at 3.8% of packs), the figure reached is probably an underestimate of the true level.

Conclusion: The New Zealand government is missing out on revenue that could be used for improving the funding of tobacco control, and smokers are being exposed to cheaper tobacco thus increasing their risk of continuing to smoke. This government and other governments can and should act at the international and national levels to end the sales of duty free tobacco.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding This work was undertaken as background work for the ITC Project (New Zealand arm) funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand and supported by other project partners (see: http://www.wnmeds.ac.nz/itcproject.html).

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.