Article Text

PDF
Adverse effects of a social contract smoking prevention program among children in Québec, Canada
  1. S Kairouz1,
  2. J O’Loughlin2,3,4,
  3. J Laguë2
  1. 1
    Concordia University, Montréal, Canada
  2. 2
    Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Montréal, Canada
  3. 3
    Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montréal, Montreal, Canada
  4. 4
    Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
  1. Correspondence to S Kairouz, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Concordia University, 1455, de Maisonneuve West, H-1125-31, Montreal, Québec, H3G 1M8, Canada; skairouz{at}alcor.concordia.ca

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a smoke-free class competition in elementary schools in Québec, Canada before widespread dissemination of the program across the province.

Methods: In a quasiexperimental study design, 843 students in 27 schools exposed to “Mission TNT.06” were compared to 1213 students in 57 matched comparison schools. Baseline data were collected in grade 6 prior to implementation of the program. Follow-up data were collected in grade 7 after students had transitioned to secondary school.

Results: The program improved knowledge about the harmful effects of second-hand smoke, but had no impact on knowledge about the harmful effects of smoking, attitudes about the acceptability of cigarettes, beliefs about the tobacco industry, or self-efficacy to resist peer pressure to smoke. After exposure to the program, intervention students were more likely to misreport their smoking status and to report unfavourable attitudes about classmates who smoke.

Conclusion: Mission TNT.06 may encourage young smokers to misreport their smoking status and to marginalise classmates who smoke. These findings prompted recommendations to conduct more in-depth evaluation of the smoke-free class competition before widespread dissemination of the program across the province.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding This project was funded by the Institut national de sante publique du Québec, with a contribution by a CTCRI-funded Interdisciplinary Capacity Enhancement Team grant.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review not commissioned; externally peer reviewed

  • Ethics approval This study received ethics approval from the Ethics Committee of the Fonds de recherche en sante du Québec (FRSQ).

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.