Article Text

PDF
‘One cigarette for you and one for me’: children of smoking and non-smoking parents during pretend play
  1. Rebecca N H de Leeuw,
  2. Maaike Verhagen,
  3. Cindy de Wit,
  4. Ron H J Scholte,
  5. Rutger C M E Engels
  1. Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Rebecca N H de Leeuw, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, PO Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands; r.deleeuw{at}bsi.ru.nl

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether perceived parental smoking is related to pretend smoking in young children and whether children influence each other in pretend smoking.

Methods Children who reported to have at least one smoking parent were coupled with children who had non-smoking parents. Both children were then asked to pretend that they were adults having a barbeque party. During their role playing, the children were observed in order to assess their pretend smoking behaviours and to examine whether children of smoking parents were more likely to initiate pretend smoking. Children were tested at their schools; the sample consisted of 206 children between 4 and 7 years of age (mean age=5.14, SD=0.87), of which 54.4% were girls. The main outcome was whether a child pretended to be smoking and whether the child initiated or followed the other child in this behaviour.

Results During their play, 63.6% (n=131) of the children pretended to smoke. Children of smoking parents were more likely to initiate pretend smoking than to follow.

Conclusions Through their own smoking, parents appear to be able to influence the way in which their children interact with peers regarding pretend smoking. More specifically, children of smoking parents might instigate smoking among their peers.

  • Children
  • parents
  • peers
  • smoking behaviour
  • pretend play
  • environment

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Linked articles 033407.

  • Funding The first author was funded by the Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen and the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF: 2006-3464) while working on this study.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the ethical committee of the Faculty of Social Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles