rss

This article has a correction

Please see: Tob Control 2011;21:64

Tob Control 20:419-424 doi:10.1136/tc.2010.038786
  • Research paper

Is youth smoking responsive to cigarette prices? Evidence from low- and middle-income countries

Editor's Choice
  1. Sara Markowitz1
  1. 1Department of Economics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  2. 2American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  1. Correspondence to Deliana Kostova, Emory University, Department of Economics, 1602 Fishburne Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA; dkostov{at}emory.edu
  • Received 7 July 2010
  • Accepted 9 June 2011
  • Published Online First 7 July 2011

Abstract

Objective To estimate the price elasticity of cigarette demand among youth in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).

Data The Global Youth Tobacco Survey was used to obtain data on the smoking behaviour of 315 353 adolescents from 17 LMIC.

Design Two-part model of cigarette demand with country fixed effects. The first part estimates the impact of prices on smoking participation while the second part estimates the impact of prices on the number of cigarettes smoked among current smokers. Besides controlling for individual characteristics such as Age, Gender, Parental Smoking and availability of Pocket Money, the authors control for confounding environmental factors such as anti-smoking sentiment, the prevalence of cigarette advertising and anti-tobacco media messAges, and ease of purchasing cigarettes. All countries in this study are represented with at least two observations over time, which allows us to control for unobserved country characteristics and/or policies that may influence smoking patterns within countries.

Results Cigarette price is an important determinant of smoking. The estimated price elasticity of smoking participation is −0.74, and the estimated price elasticity of conditional cigarette demand is approximately −1.37. The total price elasticity of cigarette demand is −2.11, implying that an increase in price of 10% would reduce youth cigarette consumption by 21.1% at the mean.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Tobacco Control.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.


This insightful video is produced by Cancer Research UK

Navigate This Article