Article Text

PDF
Anti-tobacco policy in schools: upcoming preventive strategy or prevention myth? A review of 31 studies
  1. Maria Rosaria Galanti1,
  2. Alessandro Coppo2,
  3. Elin Jonsson3,
  4. Sven Bremberg3,
  5. Fabrizio Faggiano2
  1. 1Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Centre for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Health Care District, Stockholm, Sweden
  2. 2Department of Translational Medicine, Avogadro University, Novara, Italy
  3. 3Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Dr Maria Rosaria Galanti, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Centre for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Health Care District, Stockholm 17177, Sweden; rosaria.galanti{at}ki.se

Abstract

Objective To summarise the evidence on effectiveness of school anti-tobacco policies (exposure) in preventing tobacco use (outcome) among high school students.

Data sources The search was conducted between 1 September and 30 November  2011 on six electronic databases with keywords: ‘policy’, ‘ban’, ‘restriction’ and ‘environment’ in combination with ‘adolescent’ or ‘student’, ‘school’ and ‘smoking’ in titles, abstracts or keywords. Restrictions were made to articles published in English.

Study selection Studies were included if they targeted the relevant grades/age; reported at least one outcome measure of students’ ever or current tobacco use; reported on the effects of exposure to policy separately from other interventions. Inclusion criteria were assessed independently by two of the coauthors. Of 2723 articles initially identified, 31 articles met the inclusion criteria (1.1%).

Data extraction Independent multiple observers extracted the data following the GRADE system guidelines to classify the level of evidence in relation to the review objective.

Data synthesis Studies were very heterogeneous in the definitions of exposure to school anti-tobacco policy and of tobacco use, adjustment for potential confounders and reporting of results, therefore summary quantitative measures of effect were not calculated. Qualitative summary statements were derived by reviewing the results reported in text and tables for distinct policy constructs. Evidence could be classified as low or very low, resting on cross-sectional studies with high risk of bias. Studies were rather consistent in indicating that comprehensive smoking bans, clear rules, strict policy enforcement, availability of education and prevention were associated with decreased smoking prevalence. Formally adopted and written policies, surveillance of students’ behaviour and presence/severity of sanctions were not consistently associated to students’ tobacco use.

Conclusions The evidence concerning the effectiveness of a school policy alone in preventing youth tobacco use is weak and inconclusive. Experimental studies or observational studies with longitudinal design are warranted, employing clear definitions of policy components and careful control for confounding.

  • Public policy
  • Prevention
  • Environment

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.