Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 2 July 2015
- Published on: 6 May 2015
- Published on: 2 July 2015Response to E-Letter from May 6, 2015Show More
NOT PEER REVIEWED We explicitly did not do a systematic review, which would have included things such as assessing articles for quality and assessing for presence of publication bias. Instead we opted for a narrative review. This decision was made given the limited time available for the authors to complete the supplement prior to the World Conference on Tobacco or Health and the small number of available articles after ou...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 6 May 2015Review of air quality, biological indicators and health effects of second-hand waterpipe smoke exposure - LetterShow More
NOT PEER REVIEWED Dear Editor,
Research on waterpipe smoking, also called hookah, is still emerging, and research on second-hand hookah exposure is still in its nascent stages. However, after reading the review on the various effects of second -hand waterpipe smoke exposure by Kumar et al recently published in Tobacco Control1, we noted several major issues in its execution and have serious reservations about th...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.