Article Text

PDF
Conflicts of interest in tobacco control in India: an exploratory study
  1. Neethi V Rao1,
  2. Upendra Bhojani1,
  3. Preetha Shekar2,
  4. Santosh Daddi2
  1. 1Institute of Public Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  2. 2Padmashree School of Public Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Neethi V Rao, Institute of Public Health, 250 Masters Cottage, 2 C Main, 2nd C Cross, Girinagar I Phase, Bengaluru 560085, Karnataka, India; neethi{at}iphindia.org

Abstract

Introduction The government of India introduced a tobacco control legislation in 2003 and is a party to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. However, anecdotal evidence points to the government's conflicting interests in tobacco control and trade. This research seeks to scope instances of conflicts of interests within the government and analyse how they operate in the Indian context.

Methods We conducted an exploratory study analysing documents over a 2-year period. We scanned media reports related to tobacco, documents of the tobacco industry, information retrieved from governments using the Right to Information Act and relevant websites. The data were analysed through thematic coding.

Results 100 instances of conflicts of interest were found and classified under six categories: public support for the tobacco industry by government institutions or individuals; stakeholding or ownership of tobacco companies by government functionaries; individuals holding positions both in tobacco companies and the government; formal partnerships between the tobacco industry and public agencies; conflicting policies; and incentives available for the tobacco industry. These instances occur at all three levels of government: the individual, institutional and policy levels.

Conclusions Conflicts of interest are rampant in India and operate in many different ways. These conflicts can lead to negative consequences for tobacco control with far-reaching effects. Varied strategies using legal, administrative and legislative tools need to be adopted to manage conflicts of interest.

  • Tobacco industry
  • Public policy
  • Low/Middle income country
  • Denormalization

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors NVR and UB were involved in the design, planning, interpretation of findings, writing and revised the manuscript. NVR did the primary data collection and analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. PS and SD assisted in data collection. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript submitted to the journal.

  • Funding This work was supported by the Campaign For Tobacco-Free Kids grant number India-G-46.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.