rss
Tob Control 2000;9:355-358 doi:10.1136/tc.9.4.355
  • Editorial

Quality improvement and accountability in the treatment of tobacco dependence: the need for a national training and certification programme

  1. RONALD M DAVIS
  1. Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
  2. Henry Ford Health System
  3. One Ford Place, 5C
  4. Detroit, Michigan 48202–3450, USA;
  5. rdavis1@hfhs.org
  6. School of Public Health
  7. University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
  8. 317 George Street, Suite 201
  9. New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA;
  10. sladejo@umdnj.edu
  11. Loma Linda University Schools of Medicine and Public Health
  12. Foundation for Innovations in Nicotine Dependence (FIND)
  13. PO Box 2001
  14. Loma Linda, California 92354, USA;
  15. FIND2001@aol.com
    1. JOHN SLADE
    1. Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
    2. Henry Ford Health System
    3. One Ford Place, 5C
    4. Detroit, Michigan 48202–3450, USA;
    5. rdavis1@hfhs.org
    6. School of Public Health
    7. University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
    8. 317 George Street, Suite 201
    9. New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA;
    10. sladejo@umdnj.edu
    11. Loma Linda University Schools of Medicine and Public Health
    12. Foundation for Innovations in Nicotine Dependence (FIND)
    13. PO Box 2001
    14. Loma Linda, California 92354, USA;
    15. FIND2001@aol.com
      1. LINDA HYDER FERRY
      1. Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
      2. Henry Ford Health System
      3. One Ford Place, 5C
      4. Detroit, Michigan 48202–3450, USA;
      5. rdavis1@hfhs.org
      6. School of Public Health
      7. University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
      8. 317 George Street, Suite 201
      9. New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA;
      10. sladejo@umdnj.edu
      11. Loma Linda University Schools of Medicine and Public Health
      12. Foundation for Innovations in Nicotine Dependence (FIND)
      13. PO Box 2001
      14. Loma Linda, California 92354, USA;
      15. FIND2001@aol.com

          Healthcare programmes, services, and practitioners in the USA and many other western countries are being held increasingly accountable for quality, safety, and cost effectiveness. Performance measurement—a first step toward assuring quality—is being integrated into all aspects of healthcare. Government agencies, large employers, and other institutions that pay for medical care are insisting on accountability, in response to the growing demand for medical services; the introduction of new, expensive technologies and pharmaceuticals; studies showing that medical practice often does not conform to evidence based guidelines; geographic variations in the utilisation of medical services; and the high incidence of serious medical errors.1-3

          Curiously, the treatment of tobacco dependence has not been part of this picture. Evidence based guidelines for smoking cessation treatment exist,4-7 and recommended interventions are extremely cost effective.8 But there is little effort to ensure compliance with guidelines among programmes and providers being paid to help smokers quit.

          Why quality control is needed

          The need for quality control in the treatment of tobacco use and dependence is compelling for several reasons. Firstly, the number of effective treatment options is increasing, and consumers should have assurance that they are being offered assistance that is of known benefit. Secondly, some of the newly recommended first line and second line medications6—such as bupropion, clonidine, and nortriptyline—have more serious risk profiles than nicotine replacement products, and require careful ascertainment of contraindications, side effects, and drug interactions. Thirdly, the use of combination therapy involving more than one medication increases the complexity of treatment. Fourthly, few physicians are adequately trained to use these medications, in part because tobacco dependence treatment is not a uniform component of medical school education.9

          A fifth reason is that more funding is being made available in the USA, the UK, New Zealand, and perhaps in a few other western countries, …

          Register for free content

          The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register hereto access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

          Don't forget to sign up for content alertsso you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.