Differential trends in cigarette smoking in the USA: is menthol slowing progress?
- Gary A Giovino1,
- Andrea C Villanti2,3,
- Paul D Mowery4,
- Varadan Sevilimedu4,
- Raymond S Niaura2,3,
- Donna M Vallone3,5,
- David B Abrams2,3,6
- 1Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
- 2The Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Legacy, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- 3Department of Health, Behavior and Society, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- 4Biostatistics, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- 5Department of Research and Evaluation, Legacy, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- 6Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Correspondence to Dr Gary A Giovino, Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, 311 Kimball Tower, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, New York 14214-8028, USA;
- Received 24 May 2013
- Accepted 8 August 2013
- Published Online First 30 August 2013
Introduction Mentholated cigarettes are at least as dangerous to an individual's health as non-mentholated varieties. The addition of menthol to cigarettes reduces perceived harshness of smoke, which can facilitate initiation. Here, we examine correlates of menthol use, national trends in smoking menthol and non-menthol cigarettes, and brand preferences over time.
Methods We estimated menthol cigarette use during 2004–2010 using annual data on persons ≥12 years old from the National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. We adjusted self-reported menthol status for selected brands that were either exclusively menthol or non-menthol, based on sales data. Data were weighted to provide national estimates.
Results Among cigarette smokers, menthol cigarette use was more common among 12–17 year olds (56.7%) and 18–25 year olds (45.0%) than among older persons (range 30.5% to 32.9%). In a multivariable analysis, menthol use was associated with being younger, female and of non-Caucasian race/ethnicity. Among all adolescents, the percentage who smoked non-menthol cigarettes decreased from 2004–2010, while menthol smoking rates remained constant; among all young adults, the percentage who smoked non-menthol cigarettes also declined, while menthol smoking rates increased. The use of Camel menthol and Marlboro menthol increased among adolescent and young adult smokers, particularly non-Hispanic Caucasians, during the study period.
Conclusions Young people are heavy consumers of mentholated cigarettes. Progress in reducing youth smoking has likely been attenuated by the sale and marketing of mentholated cigarettes, including emerging varieties of established youth brands. This study should inform the Food and Drug Administration regarding the potential public health impact of a menthol ban.