Cigarette trafficking in five northeastern US cities
- Kevin C Davis1,
- Victoria Grimshaw2,
- David Merriman3,4,
- Matthew C Farrelly1,
- Howard Chernick5,
- Micaela H Coady2,
- Kelsey Campbell1,
- Susan M Kansagra2
- 1RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
- 2New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, USA
- 3Department of Public Administration, Institute of Government and Public Affairs, Chicago, USA
- 4Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA
- 5Department of Economics, Hunter College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, USA
- Correspondence to Kevin C Davis, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA;
- Received 18 July 2013
- Revised 6 November 2013
- Accepted 15 November 2013
- Published Online First 11 December 2013
Background Cigarette taxation is effective in reducing tobacco use in the USA. However, these benefits are reduced when taxes are unpaid. Cigarette trafficking (ie, the illegal importation of cigarettes into a high-tax jurisdiction from a lower-tax jurisdiction) is well documented in high-tax places like New York City (NYC), but the extent of trafficking in other northeastern cities is relatively unknown.
Objective To estimate the extent of cigarette trafficking in Boston, NYC, Philadelphia, Providence and Washington, DC, and project the benefits of reducing cigarette trafficking for recouping lost taxes and reducing smoking in these cities.
Methods Littered cigarette packs were collected from a random sample of Census tracts in five US cities. Data collection yielded 1439 total littered packs. The share of cigarette packs bearing proper local, known non-local, foreign or unknown, or no tax stamp was calculated for each city. These data were used to estimate tax revenue recovery if cigarette trafficking could be eliminated. We also estimated the extent to which eliminating cigarette trafficking would reduce cigarette consumption.
Results Overall, 58.7% of packs did not have a proper local tax stamp, and 30.5–42.1% were attributed to trafficking. We estimate that eliminating cigarette trafficking would result in declines in youth smoking prevalence ranging from negligible in low-tax cities like Philadelphia to up to 9.3% in higher-tax NYC. We estimate that these five cities could recoup $680–729 million annually in cigarette tax revenue if cigarette trafficking was eliminated.
Conclusions Reducing cigarette trafficking would increase the effectiveness of tobacco taxes in reducing smoking and generate additional tax revenue, particularly in higher-taxed cities. Federal action to reduce cigarette trafficking, such as a track-and-trace system, is needed.