Statistics from Altmetric.com
- Electronic Nicotine Delivery Devices
- Non-Cigarette Tobacco Products
- Public Policy
The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in air transit, and to understand potential problems created by this practice for flight crew and patrons. Safety concerns around the long-term effects of e-cigarette use and passive inhalation in enclosed spaces are being studied, yet e-cigarettes are increasingly being used in smoke-free places.1 No studies have examined the issues of e-cigarette use in air transit.
In 2012, we surveyed 723 flight attendants for a study on secondhand smoke and air quality in the work environment. Participants were recruited through a flight attendant union and advertisement in social media groups for flight attendants. Based on discussions with flight attendants and key informants, it was determined that eligible participants had to service a minimum of two international flights per month for at least 1 year in their current position. The study focused on US carriers but participation was open to all English-speaking flight attendants.
Participants were asked “Do you use e-cigarettes? (yes or no)”. Next they were asked whether they ever observed anyone using an e-cigarette in an airport or aeroplane (yes or no), and if yes, an open-ended response obtained further details on their observations of e-cigarette use. All open responses were coded using Stata to assign categories for location of observation (aeroplane, airport, other) and person observed (passenger, flight attendant, crew) and were then validated by hand to confirm that the coding system was accurate. Other information collected in the survey included demographics, smoking status and attitudes toward smoke-free policies.
Among responses to the e-cigarette questions, 92.4% of respondents worked for a US-based carrier, 82.4% of which were a major US carrier. A total of 39 (6.8%) responded that they used e-cigarettes (table 1). After adjustment for age and gender, the OR for e-cigarette use was 13.6 (95% CI 6.3 to 29.3) comparing current smokers to never smokers.
A total of 264 (46.4%) respondents reported ever seeing e-cigarette use in an aeroplane or airport. Among those respondents, 41.3% reported seeing an e-cigarette used in an aeroplane, 25% on an aeroplane, 6.4% in both locations, and 27.3% of locations were unspecified. Within these observations of use on an aeroplane (N=109), 76.9% involved a passenger using an e-cigarette, 8.8% involved a flight attendant or crew, and 12.9% were unspecified.
Flight attendants’ open responses indicated confusion among coworkers, passengers, and crew about e-cigarette usage during flights. Notable responses included:
“Pilot had [e-cigarette] onboard and demonstrated it”
“Several [flight attendants] use them inflight in bathroom (against regulations) and on the ground.”
“[Passenger] was told by ticket agents it was allowed on board…”
“…Occasionally passengers will attempt to use them in the airplane and have to be told they are prohibited by the FAA.”
Results suggested that flight attendant e-cigarette use is similar compared to the national prevalence of 6.2% adult ever-use.2 Flight attendants commonly witnessed e-cigarette use during flights and gave conflicting reports about what was allowed by airlines, which indicates inadequate communication of policies to passengers and crew. Indeed, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT) and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) do not have official policies on e-cigarette use in air travel, though the DOT did issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in 2011 and 2013. Meanwhile, numerous domestic and international US airline companies, including United, American Airlines, Southwest, Delta and JetBlue, have begun banning e-cigarette use on a voluntary basis.3
Allowing e-cigarette use in smoke-free places undermines the denormalisation of cigarette smoking,4 particularly with respect to the milestone ban on in-flight smoking that flight attendant unions and smoke-free advocates fought incredibly hard to pass.5 The use of e-cigarettes in air transit—both on aeroplanes and in airports—must be addressed in the current policy and regulatory deliberations in the US and around the world. Given the growing evidence around passive vaping and air quality associated with e-cigarette use,6–8 banning e-cigarettes on aeroplanes and in airports is a needed step-forward for the protection of both passengers and crew.
What this paper adds
This paper provides data on the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in air transit, which is needed to inform current policy and regulatory deliberations in the US and around the world.
Our findings show that e-cigarettes are frequently used in air transit-both on aeroplanes and in airports- by flight attendants, crew, and passengers.
Findings also indicate confusion around knowledge and awareness of airline and federal regulations around e-cigarettes in air transit.
These results indicate that it is urgent to take action to consistently ban these products on flights and in airports, and to implement and enforce rules.
Contributors FAS and AN-A led the study concept and design. FAS supervised the study and oversaw the acquisition of data. AN-A had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Authors AS, LYZ, and AN-A were responsible for the analysis and interpretation of data. FAS, AN-A, and AS drafted the manuscript and were responsible for critical revision of the manuscript. FAS obtained funding for the research. AS was responsible for administrative, technical, and material support. All authors gave final approval of the manuscript.
Funding The work was supported by grant number 108594 from the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (FAMRI) to the Johns Hopkins FAMRI Center of Excellence. Co-author Laura Zheng was supported by training grant T42OH008428 from the NIOSH Education and Research Center for Occupational Safety and Health. The funders had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, writing of the report, nor in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Competing interests None.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement We are willing to make all data available to any interested parties. Please contact corresponding author Dr Stillman for more information.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.