Regular ArticleThe Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project Trial: Design and Baseline Characteristics☆,☆☆
References (44)
- et al.
School-based substance use prevention programs: why do effects decay?
Prev Med
(1993) Improving the health of U.S. children: the need for early interventions in tobacco use
Prev Med
(1993)- et al.
Rationale for the use of passive consent in smoking prevention research: politics, policies, and pragmatics
Prev Med
(1989) Reducing the health consequences of smoking: twenty-five years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General
(1989)Mor Mortal Wkly Rep
(1997)- Johnston, L, D, O'Malley, P, M, Bachman, J, G, Data from Monitoring the Future Study, retrieved September 15, 1999,...
Smoking education programs, 1960–1976
Am J Public Health
(1978)Psychosocial approaches to smoking prevention: a review of findings
Health Psychol
(1985)- National Cancer Institute. Request for Research Grant Applications: RFA NIH-NCI-DRCCA-OD-837. Longitudinal Evaluation...
- et al.
Preventing cigarette smoking among school children
Annu Rev Public Health
(1988)
Testing the generalizability of intervening mechanism theories: understanding the effects of adolescent drug use prevention interventions
J Behav Med
A meta-analysis of school-based smoking and alcohol use prevention programs
Health Educ Q
Preventing adolescent drug use: long-term results of a junior high program
Am J Public Health
Six-year follow-up of the first Waterloo school smoking prevention trial
Am J Public Health
Five- and six-year follow-up results from four seventh-grade smoking prevention strategies
J Behav Med
Mor Mortal Wkly Rep
Essential elements of school-based smoking prevention programs: research results
J Sch Health
Personal and social skills training: cognitive–behavioral approaches to substance abuse prevention
Substance abuse prevention research: recent developments and future directions
J Sch Health
Social learning theory
Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory
Cited by (16)
Changes in the influence of parents' and close friends' smoking on adolescent smoking transitions
2007, Addictive BehaviorsCitation Excerpt :To help address the methodological issues raised by prior research, pertinent features of the current study include: (1) self-reported parents' smoking status collected when the adolescent was in 3rd grade; (2) data on close friends' smoking status collected at multiple points of adolescence (5th, 7th, and 9th grade, or, ages 10, 12, and 14); (3) data on adolescent's smoking status collected at multiple points of adolescence (5th, 7th, 9th, and 12th grade, or, ages 10, 12, and 14, and 17); (4) data on adolescent's successive smoking transitions: (Transition 1) never tried to first cigarette, (Transition 2) first cigarette to monthly smoking, and (Transition 3) monthly to daily smoking; (5) a large (N = 6006) cohort of adolescents with high follow-up rates. The study sample was drawn from the combined control and intervention cohort from a large randomized, Washington State school-based tobacco use prevention trial, the Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project (HSPP), which is described in detail in Peterson, Kealey, Mann, Marek, and Sarason (2000), as well as Mann, Peterson, Marek, and Kealey (2000). All families with children enrolled in the 40 HSPP school districts were eligible to participate in the study.
Childhood friends who smoke: Do they influence adolescents to make smoking transitions?
2006, Addictive BehaviorsEffectiveness of the "Smoke-Free Class Competition" in delaying the onset of smoking in adolescence
2002, Preventive MedicineSchool-based programmes for preventing smoking
2013, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- ☆
We acknowledge with deep appreciation the children (now young adults), parents, teachers, administrators, and school staff who participated in this trial and the leadership, support, and collaboration of the 40 participating Washington school districts: Adna, Anacortes, Arlington, Bainbridge Island, Blaine, Cashmere, Castle Rock, Chimacum, Concrete, Darrington, Eatonville, Ephrata, Fife, Granite Falls, Kittitas, Lake Chelan, Lynden, Meridian, Mount Baker, Naches Valley, Napavine, Nooksack Valley, North Mason, Orting, Port Townsend, Rainier, Raymond, San Juan Island, Sequim, South Whidbey Island, Stanwood, Sultan, Tahoma, Toutle Lake, University Place, Vashon Island, Warden, Washougal, Winlock, and Woodland. Contributing to the initial experimental design and providing wise counsel throughout were Ross L. Prentice, Maureen M. Henderson, and Terry Janicki. Contributing to methods for recruitment, maintenance, and curriculum implementation in the school setting were Carl Nickerson and Robert Collins. Also contributing to the experimental design and methods were the trial's scientific consultants: J. Allan Best, K. Stephen Brown, David M. Murray, Vaughn Call, and Don Dillman. Members of an external advisory panel for minimizing contamination were Donald Iverson, David M. Murray, and Terry Pechacek. We thank Lucky Tedrow of Western Washington University for providing us with the 1980 U.S. Census data by school district. Finally, invaluable encouragement and counsel were generously provided by the trial's NCI Project Officer, Thomas J. Glynn.
- ☆☆
This research was supported by National Cancer Institute Grants CA-38269, 34847, and 57388, and by a gift from the Northern Life Insurance Company.
- 1
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed at Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue N, MP603, P.O. Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024. Fax: 206-667-5530. E-mail: [email protected].