Abstract
This paper describes a model, derived from subjective expected utility (SEU) theory, which attempts to explain the effects of a fear-arousing communication about smoking and lung cancer on smokers' decisions to try to stop smoking. According to the model, the strength of the smoker's intention to try to stop smoking will depend on three factors: (1) the utility of lung cancer; (2) the perceived reduction in the risk of getting lung cancer that follows from successfully stopping smoking (probability difference); and (3) the subjective probability of successfully stopping smoking, or confidence. The usefulness of this model vis-à-vis one based on the amount of fear aroused by the communication was investigated in two experimental studies conducted in the field in which smokers watched either a videotape about smoking or one on a different health topic. The smoking videotape influenced not only attitudes and beliefs measured immediately after exposure but also subsequent self-reports of behavior (whether or not the subject tried to stop smoking or to cut down in the 3-month period following exposure to the videotape). In accordance with predictions, the three variables specified by the model together affected intention to try to stop smoking, which in turn affected behavior. The effect of confidence on intention was relatively large. There was no evidence for the multiplicative combination of utilities and subjective probabilities predicted by a strict SEU model. Contrary to the predictions of the model, but consistent with previous research, the amount of fear aroused by the videotape had an independent effect on intention, suggesting that explanations of the effects of fear-arousing communications will have to incorporate both cognitive and emotional mediation processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychol. Rev. 84: 191–215.
Becker, M. H. (ed.). (1974).The Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behavior, Slack, N.J.
Chu, G. C. (1966). Fear arousal, efficacy and imminency.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 4: 517–524.
Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. (1975).Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
Cook, T. D., and Flay, B. R. (1978). The temporal persistence of experimentally induced attitude change: An evaluative review. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 11), Academic Press, New York.
Dabbs, J. M., and Leventhal, H. (1966). Effects of varying the recommendations in a fear arousing communication.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 4: 525–531.
Duncan, O. D. (1975).Introduction to Structural Equation Models, Academic Press, New York.
Edwards, W. (1961). Behavioral decision theory.Annu. Rev. Psychol. 12: 473–498.
Eiser, J. R., and Sutton, S. R. (1977). Smoking as a subjectively rational choice.Addict. Behav. 2: 129–134.
Eiser, J. R., Sutton, S. R., and Wober, M. (1978). Can television influence smoking?Br. J. Addict. 73: 215–219.
Fishbein, M. (1982). Social psychological analysis of smoking behavior. In Eiser, J. R. (ed.),Social Psychology and Behavioral Mediane, Wiley, London.
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975).Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Higbee, K. L. (1969). Fifteen years of fear-arousal: Research on threat appeals 1953–1968.Psychol. Bull. 72: 426–444.
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., and Kelley, H. H. (1953).Communication and Persuasion, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.
Janis, I. L. (1967). Effects of fear arousal on attitude change: Recent developments in theory and experimental research. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 3), Academie Press, New York.
Kenny, D. A. (1979).Correlation and Causality, Wiley, New York.
Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 5), Academie Press, New York.
Leventhal, H., Watts, J. C., and Pagano, F. (1967). Effects of fear and instructions on how to cope with danger.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 6: 313–321.
Lynch, J. G., and Cohen, J. L. (1978). The use of subjective expected utility theory as an aid to understanding variables that influence helping behavior.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 36: 1138–1151.
Mausner, B., and Platt, E. S. (1971).Smoking: A behavioral analysis, Pergamon, New York.
Mewborn, C. R., and Rogers, R. W. (1979). Effects of threatening and reassuring components of fear appeals on physiological and verbal measures of emotion and attitudes.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 15: 242–253.
McGuire, W. J. (1968). Personality and susceptibility to social influence. In Borgatta, E., and Lambert, W. (eds.),Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, Rand McNally, Chicago.
Ramirez, A., and Lasater, T. M. (1977). Ethnicity of Communicator, self-esteem, and reactions to fear-arousing communications.J. Soc. Psychol. 102: 79–91.
Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change.J. Psychol. 91: 93–114.
Rogers, R. W., and Mewborn, C. R. (1976). Fear appeals and attitude change: Effect of a threat's noxiousness, probability of occurrence, and the efficacy of coping responses.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 34: 54–61.
Rosen, T. J., Terry, N. S., and Leventhal, H. (1982). The role of esteem and coping in response to a threat communication.J. Res. Personal. 16: 90–107.
Shanteau, J. (1975). An information integration analysis of risky decision making. In Kaplan, M., and Schwartz, S. (eds.),Human Judgment and Decision Processes, Academie Press, New York.
Sutton, S. R. (1979). Can subjective expected utility (SEU) theory explain smokers' decisions to try to stop smoking? In Oborne, D. J., Gruneberg, M. M., and Eiser, J. R. (eds.),Research in Psychology and Medicine (Vol. 2), Academie Press, London.
Sutton, S. R. (1982). Fear-arousing communications: A critical examination of theory and research. In Eiser, J. R. (ed.),Social Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, Wiley, London.
Weisenberg, M., Kegeles, S. S., and Lund, A. K. (1980). Children's health beliefs and acceptance of a dental preventive activity.J. Health Soc. Behav. 21: 59–74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors wish to thank the Medical Research Council and Health Education Council, London, England, for financial support; Thames Television and BBC Midlands for supplying the videotapes; the Post Office and London Transport for giving us access to their employees; Gemma Hilton for coding the data; Colin Taylor for invaluable statistical advice; Gillian Woolcock for typing the manuscript; and our colleagues at the Addiction Research Unit for their helpful comments on an early draft of the paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sutton, S.R., Eiser, J.R. The effect of fear-arousing communications on cigarette smoking: An expectancy-value approach. J Behav Med 7, 13–33 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00845345
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00845345