Skip to main content
Log in

Locus of peer influence: Social crowd and best friend

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the relative influence of the best friends and social crowds of older adolescents on cigarette smoking. The data were examined to determine if there were differences in influence as a function of sex, conformity, or the mutuality of the friendship. This study used a longitudinal design that enabled the separation of the effects of peer influence from those of selective association. The results showed that social crowds differed in mean level of cigarette smoking, with burnouts smoking the most and jock/preps smoking the least. The majority of best friendships were homogeneous for social crowd. Best friend influence predicted change in cigarette smoking over a one-year period, while social crowd influence appeared to be minimal. Conformity was positively related to susceptibility to peer influence, although mutuality of the friendship and sex of the subject were not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1970). The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables.J. Exp. Social Psychol. 6: 466–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. (1972). Self-perception theory. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 6). Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, T. J. (1979). Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents.Develop. Psychol. 15: 608–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braucht, G. N. (1980). Psychosocial research on teenage drinking: Past and future. In Scarpetti, F. R., and Batesman, S. K. (eds.),Drugs and Youth Culture Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B. (1989). The role of peer groups in adolescents' adjustment to secondary school. In Berndt, T. J., and Ladd, G. W. (eds.),Peer Relationships in Child Development. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., Clasen, D., & Niess, J. (1987, April). Smoke in the looking glass: Adoelscents' perceptions of their peer group status. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore.

  • Brown, B. B., Eicher, S. A., and Petrie, S. (1986). The importance of peer group (“crowd”) affiliation in adolescence.J. Adolesc. 9: 73–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clasen, D., & Brown, B. (1985). The multidimensionality of peer pressure in adolescence.J. Youth Adolesc. 14: 451–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity.Sociol. Educat. 50: 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1983). Commentary: The relationship between friendship selection and peer influence. In Epstein, J. L., and Karweit, N. (eds.),Friends in School. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L., and Furby, L. (1970). How should we measure “change”—Or should we?Psychol. Bull. 74: 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M., and Kandel, D. (1981). Parental and peer influences on adolescents' educational plans: some further evidence.Am. J. Sociol. 87: 363–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy, D. C. (1963). The Social structure of urban adolescent peer groups.Sociometry 26: 230–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. (1983). Gender and social influence.Am. Psychol. 38: 971–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P. (1989).Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. (1983). The selection of friends on achievement and affective outcomes. In Epstein, J., and Karweit, N. (eds.),Friends in School: Patterns of Selection and Influence. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollob, H., and Reichardt, C. (19877) Taking account of lime lags in causal models.Child Develop. 58: 80–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. and Sigal, H. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude.Psychol. Bull. 76: 349–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. (1978a). Similarity in real-life adolescent friendship pairs.J. Personal. Sociol. Psychol. 36: 306–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. (1978b). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships.Am. J. Sociol. 84: 427–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. (1985). On processes of peer influences in adolescent drug use: A developmental perspective.Alcohol Substance Abuse Adolesc.

  • Kandel, D., Kessler, R., and Margulies, R. (1978). Antecedents of adolescent initiation into stages of drug use: A developmental analysis.J. Youth Adolesc. 7: 13–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanese, R., Banks, F., and Keller, M. (1972). Smoking behavior in a teenage population: A multivariate conceptual approach.Am. J. Public Health 62: 807–812.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mosbach, P., and Leventhal, H. (1988). Peer group identity and smoking: Implications for intervention.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 97: 238–245.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pechacek, T., Murray, D., Luepker, R., Mittelmark, M., Johnson, C., and Shultz, J. (1984). Measurement of adolescent smoking behavior: Rationale and methods.J. Behav. Med. 7: 12–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riester, A. E., and Zucker, R. A. (1968). Adolescent social structure and drinking behavior.Person. Guid. J. 23: 304–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugosa, D., Brandt, D., and Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change.Psychol. Bull. 92: 726–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, S. J., Presson, C. C., Chassin, L., Corty, E., and Olshavsky, R. (1983). The false consensus effect in estimates of smoking prevalence: Underlying mechanisms.Personal. Social Psychol. Bull. 9: 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, W., & Cheek, N. (1987). Social structure during the school years: Onset of the degrouping process.Am. Sociol. Rev. 52: 218–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, S., and Udry, R. (1986). Autism and accuracy in adolescent perceptions of friends' sexual attitudes and behavior.J. Appl. Psychol. 16: 361–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbert, K. A., and Deqirmencioglu, S. (1990). Peer influence on adolescent values. Paper presented at meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, 1989.

  • Urberg, K. A., Shyu, S. J., and Liang, J. (1990). Peer influence in adolescent cigarette smoking.Addict. Behav. 115: 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by NIH grant HD18425 awarded to Kathryn Urberg.

Obtained Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin in the Department of Educational Psychology. A developmental psychologist, her major area of interest is adolescent social development.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Urberg, K.A. Locus of peer influence: Social crowd and best friend. J Youth Adolescence 21, 439–450 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537896

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537896

Keywords

Navigation