Abstract
Objective
To examine how student beliefs about tobacco industry behaviour and marketing practices were related to occasional and regular smoking among 9th to 12th graders. These findings can provide insight for developing new tobacco industry denormalization messages for youth smoking populations.
Methods
Cross-sectional data were collected from 14,767 grade 9 to 12 students attending 22 secondary schools within one Public Health Region of Canada using the Tobacco Module of School Heath Action, Planning and Evaluation System (SHAPES). Logistic regression analyses were used to determine if different beliefs about tobacco companies were able to differentiate never smokers from occasional smokers, and occasional smokers from regular smokers.
Results
Occasional and regular smoking behaviour was significantly related to student beliefs about tobacco companies doing good things in the community, manipulating young people to think smoking is cool, advertising to youth, and using athletes and sports sponsorships to get young people to smoke.
Conclusions
This study identified that beliefs about tobacco industry behaviour and marketing practices were related to youth smoking behaviour. In order to address the unique needs of smoking youth, discussions for future tobacco industry denormalization campaigns should consider messages tailored to focus on corporate social responsibility, sport and cultural event sponsorship and industry manipulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2004) The health consequences of smoking: a report of the surgeon general. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office of Smoking and Health, Atlanta, GA
Health Canada (2005) New directions for tobacco control in Canada: a national strategy. Steering Committee of the National Strategy to Reduce Tobacco Use in Canada, Ottawa, ON
Non-Smokers’ Right Association (2004) Tobacco industry denormalization: telling the truth about the tobacco industry’s role in the tobacco epidemic. Non-Smokers’ Rights Association Smoking and Health Action Foundation, Toronto, ON
Bauer UE, Johnson TM, Hopkins RS, Brooks RG (2000) Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program: findings from the Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 1998–2000. JAMA 284(6):723–728
Sly DF, Heald GR, Ray S (2001) The Florida “truth” anti-tobacco media evaluation: design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations. Tob Control 10(1):9–15
Farrelly MC, Healton CG, Davis KC, Messeri P, Hersey JC, Haviland ML (2002) Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health 92(6):901–907
Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Haviland ML, Messeri P, Healton CG (2005) Evidence of a dose-response relationship between “truth” antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health 95(3):425–431
Pierce JP, Choi WS, Gilpin EA, Farkas AJ, Merritt RK (1996) Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States. Health Psychol 15(5):355–361
Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Yarsevich JM et al. (2002) Getting to the Truth: Assessing Youths’ Reactions to the truthsm and “Think. Don’t Smoke” Tobacco Countermarketing Campaigns. American Legacy Foundation, Legacy First Look Report (9), June 2002
Ashley MJ, Cohen JE (2003) What the public thinks about the tobacco industry and its products. Tob Control 12(4):396–400
Goldman LK, Glantz SA (1998) Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns. JAMA 279(10):772–777
Ford-Hutchinson S, Rothwell A (2002) The public’s perception of advertising in today’s society: Report on the findings from a research study. Advertising Standards Authority, London, UK
Farrelly MC, Niederdeppe J, Yarsevich J (2003) Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: past, present, and future directions. Tob Control 12(Suppl1):i35–47
Pechman C, Stewart DW (1990) The effects of comparative advertising on attention, memory, and purchase intentions. J Consumer Res 17:180–191
Pechman C, Reibling ET (2000) Planning an effective anti-smoking mass media campaign targeting adolescents. J Public Health Manag Practice 6(3):80–94
The School Health Action, Planning and Evaluation System [online]. 2005 (Cited 2005 Oct 10). Available from: http://www.shapes.uwaterloo.ca/
Leatherdale ST, McDonald PW, Cameron R, Brown KS (2005) A multi-level analysis examining the relationship between social influences for smoking and smoking onset. Am J Health Behav 29:520–530
Health Canada (2005) 2002 Youth Smoking Survey Technical Report. Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, ON
Hirschhorn N (2004) Corporate social responsibility and the tobacco industry: hope or hype? Tob Control 13(4):447–453
Ajzen I (1991) The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organ Behav Human Decision Proc 50:179–211
Dewhirst T, Sparks R (2003) Intertextuality, tobacco sponsorship of sports, and adolescent male smoking culture. J Sport Social Issues 27(4):372–398
Dewhirst T, Hunter A (2002) Tobacco sponsorship of Formula One and CART auto racing: tobacco brand exposure and enhanced symbolic imagery through co-sponsors’ third party advertising. Tob Control 11(2):146–150
Hafez N, Ling PM (2005) How Philip Morris built Marlboro into a global brand for young adults: implications for international tobacco control. Tob Control 14(4):262–271
Anderson S, Hastings G, MacFadyen L (2002) Strategic marketing in the UK tobacco industry. Lancet Oncol 3(8):481–486
Gilpin EA, White VM, Pierce JP (2005) How effective are tobacco industry bar and club marketing efforts in reaching young adults? Tob Control 14(1):186–192
Wen CP, Chen T, Tsai YY et al. (2005) Are marketing campaigns in Taiwan by foreign tobacco companies targeting young smokers? Tob Control 14(Suppl1):i38–i44
Teague CE (1973) Research planning memorandum on some thoughts about new brands of cigarettes for the youth market. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. February 02, 1973. Bates No, 502987357–7368. Available at: http://www.rjrtdocs.com, www.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/mangini. Accessed June 06, 2005
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada’s Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation (CBRPE) for providing financial support for this project. The authors would also like to thank Public Health and the schools and students who participated, and Dr. David Hammond at the University of Waterloo for his developmental work with the denormalization items used in the SHAPES Tobacco Module.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leatherdale, S.T., Sparks, R. & Kirsh, V.A. Beliefs about Tobacco Industry (mal)Practices and Youth Smoking Behaviour: Insight for Future Tobacco Control Campaigns (Canada). Cancer Causes Control 17, 705–711 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-006-0004-z
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-006-0004-z