Rapid smoking of menthol and nonmenthol cigarettes by black and white smokers
References (20)
- et al.
Subjective reactions to rapid and normal paced aversive smoking
Addict. Behav.
(1981) menthol modulates oral sensations of warmth and cold
Physiol. Behav.
(1985)Menthol inhibits the perception of warmth
Physiol. Behav.
(1986)- et al.
Medical risk and therapeutic effectiveness of rapid smoking
Behav. Ther.
(1979) - et al.
The Merck index: An encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs, and biologicals
(1989) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
(1989)- et al.
Cigarette advertising and Black-White differences in brand preference
Public Health Rep.
(1987) - et al.
Measuring nicotine dependence: A review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire
J. Behav. Med.
(1989) - et al.
The pharmacological basis of therapeutics
(1965) Differences in biological responses to cigarette smoking remain unexplained
Am. J. Public Health.
(1991)
Cited by (32)
Lack of effect of menthol level and type on smokers' estimated mouth level exposures to tar and nicotine and perceived sensory characteristics of cigarette smoke
2012, Regulatory Toxicology and PharmacologyCitation Excerpt :With regard to puffing topography (puff number and volume), direct comparisons of puff numbers taken from mentholated and non-mentholated cigarettes were reported in seven studies. No significant difference between menthol and non-mentholated cigarettes was reported in four of the studies (Caskey et al., 1993; Miller et al., 1994; Ahijevych et al., 1996; Pickworth et al., 2002). A significantly reduced puff number was associated with mentholated products in the other three studies (Nil and Battig, 1989; Jarvik et al., 1994; McCarthy et al., 1995).
Menthol smoking in relation to time to first cigarette and cotinine: Results from a community-based study
2012, Regulatory Toxicology and PharmacologyCitation Excerpt :Therefore we further examined this relationship in relation to the biological uptake of nicotine. While some previous studies have shown that menthol smokers have higher cotinine levels (Clark et al., 1996; Caskey et al., 1993; Ahijevych and Garrett, 2004) most data including our previous report from this study found no differences (Wagenknecht et al., 1990; Ahijevych et al., 1996; Muscat et al., 2009a; Heck, 2009; Signorello et al., 2009; Caraballo et al., 2011). None of these studies considered how menthol may vary by TTFC, which itself is highly associated with increased cotinine (Muscat et al., 2009b; Etter et al., 1999).
A survey of mouth level exposure to cigarette smoke in the United States
2011, Regulatory Toxicology and PharmacologyCitation Excerpt :Direct comparisons of puff numbers taken from mentholated and non-mentholated cigarettes were reported in seven studies. No significant difference between menthol and non-mentholated cigarettes was reported in four of the studies (Caskey et al., 1993; Miller et al., 1994; Ahijevych et al., 1996; Pickworth et al., 2002). A significantly reduced puff number was associated with mentholated products in three of the studies (Nil and Battig, 1989; Jarvik et al., 1994; McCarthy et al., 1995).
A review and assessment of menthol employed as a cigarette flavoring ingredient
2010, Food and Chemical ToxicologyPossible effects on smokers of cigarette mentholation: A review of the evidence relating to key research questions
2007, Regulatory Toxicology and PharmacologyLung cancer risk in white and black Americans
2003, Annals of Epidemiology