Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 18, Issue 2, March 1989, Pages 304-321
Preventive Medicine

Longitudinal effects of the midwestern prevention project on regular and experimental smoking in adolescents

https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(89)90077-7Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare longitudinal smoking prevention program effects estimated on a population-based cohort sample of sixth- and seventh-grade students (average n per year = 4,664) using different schools as units of analysis (middle/junior high school as the school of origin or high school as the endpoint school of intervention). Fifty schools in 15 school districts were demographically matched and assigned to either a school and community-based program for prevention of cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use, or a health education as usual control group. Smoking was measured by questionnaires administered to the students. An expired air (CO) measure of smoking was also administered to increase accuracy of self-reports. Program effects were estimated with regression analyses, controlling for school-level socioeconomic status, racial/ethnic make-up, urbanicity, and grade. Using school of origin as the unit of analysis, program effects showed 1 year net reductions of −8, −6, and −5% in prevalence rates of smoking in the last month, last week, and last 24 hr; 2-year program effects showed similar net reductions of −6, −5, and −3% (P's < 0.10–0.001). Analyses with endpoint school as the unit showed slightly weaker effects at the 2-year follow-up, the year during which 64% of students had moved to a junior high or high school. The findings are discussed in terms of the potential contamination of experimental groups in longitudinal studies from school consolidations, family mobility, and feeder patterns to high schools, and the different smoking environments represented by middle, junior high, and high schools.

References (35)

  • MA Pentz

    Developmental Transitions: Effects of School, Grade, and Family Changes on Smoking Prevention

  • DB Connell et al.

    Summary of findings of the School Health Education Evaluation: Health promotion effectiveness, implementation, and costs

    J. Sch. Health

    (1985)
  • JM Moscowitz et al.

    Alcohol and drug problems in the schools: Results of a national survey of school administrators

    J. Stud. Alcohol

    (1988)
  • WB Hansen et al.

    The consistency of peer and parent influences on tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use among young adolescents

    J. Behav. Med.

    (1987)
  • RS Barcikowski

    Statistical power with group mean as the unit of analysis

    J. Educ. Stat.

    (1981)
  • A Biglan et al.

    Current methodological issues in research on smoking prevention

  • L Burstein et al.

    Choosing the appropriate unit for investigating school effects

    Aust. J. Educ.

    (1977)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Exposure to school and community based prevention programs and reductions in cigarette smoking among adolescents in the United States, 2000-08

      2012, Evaluation and Program Planning
      Citation Excerpt :

      A number of theory-based behavioral prevention programs have been devised and evaluated through randomized controlled trials (National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2003a; Thomas & Perera, 2006; US Department of Education, 2001; US Department of Health and Human Services, 2000). Typical examples of these programs include “Life Skills Training” (LST) (Botvin, Baker, Dusenbury, Botvin, & Diaz, 1995; Zollinger et al., 2003), Midwestern Prevention Project (MPP) (Pentz et al., 1989), “Project Towards No Tobacco Use” (TNT) (Dent et al., 1995; Sussman et al., 1993), “Know Your Body” (KYB) (Walter, 1989), “The Tobacco and Alcohol Prevention Project” (TAPP) (Hansen, Johnson, Flay, Graham, & Sobel, 1988), “Class of 1989 Study of the Minnesota Heart Health Program” (MHHP) (Perry, Kelder, Murray, & Klepp, 1992) and “Project Adolescent Learning Experience in Resistance Training” (ALERT) (Ellickson, Bell, & McGuigan, 1993), to name a few. A review of 94 randomized trials to assess various smoking prevention programs indicated the efficacy of behavioral interventions in delaying and preventing smoking initiation among children (aged 5–12) and adolescents (12–18) in the US (Thomas & Perera, 2006).

    • Collaborating on evolving the future

      2014, Behavioral and Brain Sciences
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, Grant No. R01 DA03976 to Mary Ann Pentz, Ph.D., Principal Investigator, and the Kauffman Foundation, Lilly Endowment, and Marion Laboratories.

    View full text