The measurement of substance use among adolescents: When is the ‘bogus pipeline’ method needed?☆
References (19)
- et al.
Expired air carbon monoxide and saliva thiocyanate: relationships to self-reports of marijuana smoking and cigarette smoking
Addictive Behavior
(1985) - et al.
Evaluation of cigarette smoking amongst adolescents: The Muscatine study
Preventive Medicine
(1982) - et al.
The validity of smoking self-reports by adolescents: A reexamination of the bogus pipeline procedure
Addictive Behaviors
(1987) - et al.
Are self-reports of adolescent deviance valid? Biochemical measures, randomized response, and the bogus pipeline in smoking behavior
Social Forces
(1983) - et al.
Influence of an objective measure on self-reports of behavior
Journal of Applied Psychology
(1982) - et al.
Validity of self-reports of adolescent cigarette smoking
The International Journal of the Addictions
(1982) - et al.
Adolescents' self-reports of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use: examining the comparability of videotape, cartoon, and verbal bogus pipeline procedu res
Psychological Reports
(1984) - et al.
Increasing the validity of self-reports of drug use: Generalizability of a bogus pipeline procedure used to study cigarette smoking
- et al.
BMDP Statistical Software. 1983 Revised printing
(1983)
Cited by (164)
Proactive telephone counseling for adolescent smokers: Comparing regular smokers with infrequent and occasional smokers on treatment receptivity, engagement, and outcomes
2016, Drug and Alcohol DependenceCitation Excerpt :Staff data collectors explained survey procedures to students in advance; students could ask questions or decline survey participation. Using the “pipeline” technique to enhance the accuracy of self-reported smoking (Murray and Perry, 1987), students completing an in-class survey were asked to provide a saliva sample for possible cotinine testing (with 96.5% agreeing and providing a sample). Data collectors also informed students that they might be invited to participate in future research activities; students had the option to decline future contact.
Early onset of cannabis use: Does personality modify the relation with changes in perceived parental involvement?
2015, Drug and Alcohol DependenceCitation Excerpt :However, the fact that predominantly intact two-parent families were recruited for this study (86%), and that families with low socio-economic status were underrepresented in the sample, might limit the generalizability of our findings to broken families and to families from low socio-economic backgrounds. Third, although confidentiality of the study had been emphasized, self-reports of substance use may be subject to over- or underreporting of cannabis use (Murray and Perry, 1987), which may have influenced the results. Fourth, the longitudinal design we employed aimed at testing linkages between changes in parenting and the risk of early cannabis use, and moderation by personality, and did not test the temporal sequence of changes in parenting and risk of early cannabis use.
Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation in college students: A group randomized controlled trial
2010, Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :Participants were led to believe that their smoking status could be verified through saliva analysis. This appears to reduce inaccurate reporting (Murray and Perry, 1987), but it is possible that cessation rates were overestimated. While we performed exploratory analyses to investigate the potential for moderation, the study was not powered to detect interaction effects.
- ☆
This research was supported through grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01-DA-03205 and R01-DA-03044) and the National Cancer Institute (R01-CA-38275).
- ∗
The authors thank the students and staff of Minnesota Independent School District 281 for their cooperation in this research. In addition we thank Linda Schmid, Lisa Roche, and Catherine O'Connell who assisted in the analysis of the data; Jan Whitebeck who directed the school survey; Laurie Zurbey who prepared the manuscript; and Maurice Mittlemark who critiqued an earlier draft.