Stages of adolescent cigarette smoking acquisition: Measurement and sample profiles

https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(87)90046-3Get rights and content

Abstract

A stage model of adolescent cigarette smoking acquisition was developed and an instrument to measure the stages was created. Internal validity was obtained based on principal component analysis, item analysis, and coefficient alpha. Three distinct components were labeled precontemplation, decision-making, and maintenance. The scales had reliability coefficients ranging from .86 to .94. External validity was obtained by relating the scale scores to measures of smoking behavior and intent to smoke. A cluster analysis resulted in nine distinct clusters, including profiles representing precontemplation, contemplation, decision-making, action, and maintenance stages. Further validity was obtained for the clusters by comparing groups on the perceived positive and negative consequences of smoking, and the derived pleasure from smoking.

References (31)

  • B.R. Flay

    Psychosocial approaches to smoking prevention: A review of findings

    Health Psychology

    (1985)
  • K. Glynn et al.

    A cognitive developmental approach to smoking prevention

  • W.B. Hansen

    Behavioral predictors of abstinence: Early indicators of dependence on tobacco among adolescents

    The International Journal of the Addictions

    (1983)
  • D.N. Jackson

    The dynamics of structured personality tests: 1971

    Psychological Review

    (1971)
  • C.E. Jones et al.

    The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1971)
  • Cited by (100)

    • Youth susceptibility to tobacco use in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries, 2001–2018

      2022, Preventive Medicine Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      In GCC countries, most current tobacco users start using tobacco before age 18 (Wellman et al., 2016; Nasser et al., 2020). Tobacco use behavior passes through several stages: 1) preparation; 2) initiation; 3) experimentation; 4) regular use 5) addiction (Stern et al., 1987). The point of greatest susceptibility is between the stage of preparation and initiation (Pierce et al., 1996).

    • School bullying and susceptibility to smoking among never-tried cigarette smoking students

      2016, Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      One possible explanation for the differences in the findings in both studies may be due to the different outcome variables analyzed, with the current study focusing on vulnerability to future smoking. As discussed, the decision to initiate or start smoking is not as easy as a binary choice (yes versus no), it is more likely to involve a process or sequence of stages (Mayhew et al., 2000; Stern et al., 1987). Therefore, identifying the characteristics of those with a higher propensity to initiate smoking is beneficial for prevention targeting and public health.

    • A comparison of daily and occasional smokers' implicit affective responses to smoking cues

      2012, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although many individuals begin smoking in adolescence, a sizable proportion of individuals begin smoking or show increases in smoking behavior after age 18 (e.g., Chassin, Presson, Pitts, & Sherman, 2000; Chassin, Presson, Sherman, & Edwards, 1991). Although several studies have found that many college students explicitly report negative attitudes towards smoking regardless of their own smoking behavior (Elders, Perry, Eriksen, & Giovino, 1994; Goddard, 1992; Johnston, O'Malley, & Bachman, 1996; Stern, Prochaska, Velicer, & Elder, 1987), social desirability may diminish the reporting of positive emotions in self-reports of attitudes towards smoking (e.g., Swanson, Rudman, & Greenwald, 2001). Because of the limitations of explicit measures, researchers use implicit measures to examine smokers' affective reactions to smoking by focusing on their responses to smoking-related cues, such as pictures of cigarettes or other smoking-related objects, using a range of paradigms such as the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was partially supported by Grant CA 27821 from the National Cancer Institute. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Joseph Rossi of the University of Rhode Island for his assistance in data analysis, and the staff of the Pawtucket Heart Health Program for their assistance in data collection.

    View full text