Brief reportSmoking topography in tobacco chippers and dependent smokers☆
References (19)
- et al.
Relation of puff volume to other topographical measures of smoking
Addictive Behaviors
(1983) - et al.
Smoking typology profiles of chippers and regular smokers
Journal of Substance Abuse
(1994) - et al.
Influence of smoking fewer cigarettes on exposure to tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide
New England Journal of Medicine
(1986) The alcohol dependence syndrome: A concept as stimulus to enquiry
British Journal of Addiction
(1986)- et al.
Occasional smoking among adults: Evidence from the California Tobacco Survey
Tobacco Control
(1992) - et al.
Does nicotine yield affect puff volume?
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
(1982) - et al.
Recording puff volume in smoking
Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation
(1983) - et al.
Smoking topography in a nonlaboratory environment
International Journal of the Addictions
(1987) Statistics
(1988)
Cited by (43)
The use of ambulatory assessment in smoking cessation
2018, Addictive BehaviorsCitation Excerpt :Smoking topography studies provide useful information on the relationship between smoking behavior and smoking cessation, and topography has been measured in settings outside of the laboratory. Prior work has examined smoking topography in the real world to determine differences in smoking patterns among groups of people (e.g., chippers vs dependent smokers; Brauer, 1996; Korean American vs White men; Chung et al., 2015). Research has also shown that self-reported cigarettes smoked per day were not associated with smoking topography patterns in day-to-day life (Hatsukami, Morgan, & Pickens, 1987).
Neural correlates of performance monitoring in daily and intermittent smokers
2014, Clinical NeurophysiologyCitation Excerpt :These self-reported “some day” smokers, also referred to as “chippers” or intermittent smokers (ITS), comprise 22% (9.9 million) of the U.S. smoking population and this number is believed to be increasing (CDC, 2011b; Shiffman et al., 2012). Their ability to avoid dependence cannot be attributed to differences in smoking topography (e.g., number of puffs, puff duration, inter-puff/cigarette interval) or changes in blood–nicotine concentration (Brauer et al., 1996; Coggins et al., 2009; Shiffman, 1989). Compared to daily, dependent smokers, long-term ITS report having an internal locus of control and greater self-control compared to regular smokers (Coggins et al., 2009; Kassel et al., 1994; Shiffman and Paty, 2006).
Light and intermittent tobacco smokers
2010, Revue des Maladies RespiratoiresEstimation of transitional probabilities of discrete event systems from cross-sectional survey and its application in tobacco control
2010, Information SciencesCitation Excerpt :4) Recall biases: to obtain data on behavior dynamics, a longitudinal survey may ask each participant to recall in great details his or her smoking behavior in the past; this may result in erroneous data due to memory loss. ( 5) Age range of the subjects in a longitudinal sample shifts up as the subjects are followed up over time, affecting the use of such data in tobacco control practice [10,11,13–15,24–27,35,36,39,41,42,44]. Compared to a longitudinal survey, it will be easier and more cost-effective to conduct a cross-sectional survey in tobacco control practice.
On the Nature of Nicotine Addiction: A Taxometric Analysis
2008, Journal of Abnormal PsychologyReal-world effectiveness of smoking cessation strategies for young and older adults: Findings from a nationally representative cohort
2020, Nicotine and Tobacco Research
- ☆
This work was conducted at the University of Minnesota Tobacco Research Laboratory and funded by R01 DA02988.