Note
Do cigarette producers price-discriminate by state? An empirical analysis of local cigarette pricing and taxation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00498-5Get rights and content

Abstract

This study analyzes the interactive effects of oligopoly pricing, state taxation, and anti-smoking regulations on retail cigarette prices by state, using panel data for the 50 US states between 1960 and 1990. The results indicate that cigarette producers do price-discriminate by state, though the effect is not large relative to the final retail price. There are two further results: (1) state taxes are more than passed on — a 1-cent state tax increase results in a price increase of 1.11 cents, and (2) sellers offset state and local anti-smoking laws with lower prices, thereby blunting effects of the regulations.

References (40)

  • J.E. Harris

    The 1983 increase in the federal cigarette excise tax

  • D.W. Johnson et al.

    Churches and church membership in the United States, 1971

    (1974)
  • M. Pertschuk et al.

    Major local smoking ordinances in the United States

    (1989)
  • R.H. Porter

    The impact of government policy on the US cigarette industry

  • J.M. Poterba

    State responses to fiscal crises: the effects of budgetary institutions and politics

    Journal of Political Economy

    (1994)
  • B. Quinn et al.

    Churches and church membership in the United States, 1980

    (1982)
  • Rand McNally

    Rand McNally road atlas

    (1992)
  • M.J. Roberts et al.

    An empirical analysis of dynamic, nonprice competition in an oligopolistic industry

    Rand Journal of Economics

    (1988)
  • F.M. Scherer et al.

    Industrial market structure and economic performance

    (1990)
  • M.H. Showalter

    Monopoly behavior with intertemporal demands

  • Cited by (124)

    • Do sin tax hikes spur cheating in interpersonal exchange?

      2022, Accounting, Organizations and Society
      Citation Excerpt :

      Finally, we also add to the literature on who bears the economic cost of sin tax increases. Prior research has generally shown that cigarette taxes tend to be fully shifted to consumers (Barzel, 1976; Delipalla & O’Donnell, 2001; Hanson & Sullivan, 2009; Johnson, 1978; Keeler et al., 1996; Sumner & Ward, 1981). Our results suggest, however, that in some settings these costs may be passed on to other individuals through fraudulent transactions.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text