Original article
Effective communication: perception of two anti-smoking advertisements

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(96)00958-5Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper presents part of a survey which investigated people's response to different approaches to health education campaigns. The main objective of the original study was to find out whether the respondents preferred a fear-inducing campaign or a positive image advertising. Two anti-smoking advertisements produced by the Health Education Board for Scotland (HEBS), one using a fear appeal and the other, using a positive image were examined. A sample of 394 subjects in three age groups took part in the study and they were interviewed by means of a questionnaire. A high proportion in each group, including smokers indicated that they preferred the fear-inducing campaign. To investigate why people prefer this type of image, respondents were asked to explain their reasons. It was found that effective communication requires: (1) reality, (2) clear cut message, (3) simplicity, and (4) thought provoking nature and impact of the message. In addition, with regard to the advertising appeals it was found that both positive image and negative image campaigns could be used to attract attention and consequently communicate with the target population. Finally, the findings of this study in the light of psychosocial theories are discussed, and the Preference Model is proposed as providing a better understanding of the process behind people's preferences.

References (21)

  • H Leventhal

    Findings and theory in the study of fear communications

  • RE Petty et al.

    The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion

  • RA Winnett et al.

    Health psychology and public health: an integrative approach

  • MA Nemcek

    Health beliefs and preventive behaviour: a review of research literature

    Am Assoc Occup Health Nurs J

    (1990)
  • L Wallack

    Two approaches to health promotion in the mass media

    World Health Forum

    (1990)
  • K Tones et al.

    Health Education: effectiveness, efficiency and equity

  • A Montazeri

    An investigation into the positive image and fear-inducing healthy adverts

  • A Montazeri et al.

    Health education campaign: positive image or fear-inducing? Results of two pilot projects

    J Inst Health Educ

    (1994)
  • A Montazeri et al.

    Evaluation of two national anti-smoking health education campaigns: the Scottish experience

    J Inst Health Educ

    (1996)
  • SR Sutton

    Fear-arousing communications: a critical examination of theory and research

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • Fear and Humor Appeals in “The Real Cost” Campaign: Evidence of Potential Effectiveness in Message Pretesting

    2019, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Fear appeals also produced more negative smoking attitudes than the control condition, but the effect of humor appeals on smoking attitudes was not significant. The mixed evidence on attitudes notwithstanding, the comparison against control in this study represents an important extension of previous literature, which has focused almost exclusively on audience evaluations of fear- versus humor-appeal messages.6,26–29 Indeed, when only perceived ad effectiveness—an evaluation measure—is considered, the current findings are entirely consistent with previous research, showing fear ads to be rated as more effective than humor ads.

  • Why Audiences’ Voice on Developing Anti-Smoking Messages Matters

    2022, Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text