PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Nancy L Fleischer AU - Paula Lozano AU - Yun-Hsuan Wu AU - James W Hardin AU - Gang Meng AU - Angela D Liese AU - Geoffrey T Fong AU - James F Thrasher TI - Disentangling the roles of point-of-sale ban, tobacco retailer density and proximity on cessation and relapse among a cohort of smokers: findings from ITC Canada Survey AID - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054081 DP - 2018 Mar 08 TA - Tobacco Control PG - tobaccocontrol-2017-054081 4099 - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2018/03/08/tobaccocontrol-2017-054081.short 4100 - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2018/03/08/tobaccocontrol-2017-054081.full AB - Objective To examine how point-of-sale (POS) display bans, tobacco retailer density and tobacco retailer proximity were associated with smoking cessation and relapse in a cohort of smokers in Canada, where provincial POS bans were implemented differentially over time from 2004 to 2010.Methods Data from the 2005 to 2011 administrations of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Canada Survey, a nationally representative cohort of adult smokers, were linked via residential geocoding with tobacco retailer data to derive for each smoker a measure of retailer density and proximity. An indicator variable identified whether the smoker’s province banned POS displays at the time of the interview. Outcomes included cessation for at least 1 month at follow-up among smokers from the previous wave and relapse at follow-up among smokers who had quit at the previous wave. Logistic generalised estimating equation models were used to determine the relationship between living in a province with a POS display ban, tobacco retailer density and tobacco retailer proximity with cessation (n=4388) and relapse (n=866).Results Provincial POS display bans were not associated with cessation. In adjusted models, POS display bans were associated with lower odds of relapse which strengthened after adjusting for retailer density and proximity, although results were not statistically significant (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.07, p=0.089). Neither tobacco retailer density nor proximity was associated with cessation or relapse.Conclusions Banning POS retail displays shows promise as an additional tool to prevent relapse, although these results need to be confirmed in larger longitudinal studies.