Table 7

Logistic regression analysis of association between social participation and the odds ratio of daily and intermittent smoking, respectively, compared to all non-smokers and presented as crude odds ratio (OR), adjusted OR, and confidence intervals (95 % CI): women. The Malmö diet and cancer study 1992-94.

Crude OR Model I Model II Model III Model IV Model V
Daily smokers
Social participation7-150 1.6 (1.4 to 1.8)1.7 (1.5 to 2.0)1.7 (1.5 to 2.0)1.7 (1.5 to 1.9)1.7 (1.5 to 1.9)1.5 (1.3 to 1.8)
Age7-151 0.8 (0.7 to 0.8)0.8 (0.7 to 0.8)0.8 (0.7 to 0.8)0.8 (0.7 to 0.8)0.7 (0.7 to 0.8)
Country of origin7-152 1.0 (0.8 to 1.1)1.0 (0.8 to 1.1)0.9 (0.8 to 1.1)0.9 (0.7 to 1.0)
Self reported diseases7-153 1.2 (1.0 to 1.4)1.1 (1.0 to 1.3)1.1 (1.0 to 1.3)
Marital status7-154 1.4 (1.3 to 1.4)1.4 (1.3 to 1.4)
Socioeconomic status7-160 1.1 (1.0 to 1.1)
Intermittent smokers
Social participation7-150 0.9 (0.7 to 1.2)1.0 (0.8 to 1.3)1.0 (0.8 to 1.3)1.0 (0.8 to 1.3)1.0 (0.8 to 1.3)1.0 (0.8 to 1.3)
Age7-151 0.8 (0.7 to 0.9)0.8 (0.7 to 0.9)0.8 (0.7 to 0.9)0.8 (0.7 to 0.9)0.8 (0.7 to 0.9)
Country of origin7-152 0.8 (0.6 to 1.2)0.8 (0.6 to 1.2)0.8 (0.6 to 1.2)0.8 (0.6 to 1.2)
Self reported diseases7-153 1.0 (0.8 to 1.4)1.0 (0.8 to 1.4)1.0 (0.8 to 1.4)
Marital status7-154 1.2 (1.0 to 1.3)1.2 (1.0 to 1.3)
Socioeconomic status7-160 1.0 (0.9 to 1.1)
  • 7-150 Low versus high.

  • 7-151 Per 5 year interval.

  • 7-152 Born in country other than Sweden versus born in Sweden.

  • 7-153 Disease versus no disease.

  • 7-154 Four marital status groups.

  • 7-160 Eight socioeconomic groups.