OLS regression model, influences on smoking behaviour in 2002
| n = 56 counties with no missing data | B | SC |
|---|---|---|
| OLS, ordinary least square; SC, standardised coefficient; SWAT, Students Working Against Tobacco; TPPO, Tobacco Product Placement Ordinance. | ||
| Cells in the column labeled “B” display coefficients and their corresponding standard errors. *Denotes coefficients that are statistically different from zero at p<0.05. | ||
| TPPO enacted | –0.46 (1.03) | –0.05 |
| Smoking rates in 2000 | 0.20 (0.14) | 0.21 |
| SWAT membership in 2000 | 0.27* (0.12) | 0.44* |
| SWAT membership in 2002 | –0.11 (0.14) | –0.17 |
| Anti-tobacco event participation in 2000 | 0.08 (0.16) | 0.08 |
| Anti-tobacco event participation in 2002 | 0.06 (0.25) | 0.05 |
| Own tobacco company item in 2000 | 0.06 (0.25) | 0.04 |
| Own tobacco company item in 2002 | 0.63* (0.27) | 0.34* |
| County population (in 10 000’s,from 2000 census) | 0.01 (0.01) | 0.08 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.53 | |