Table 4

Relationship of smoking status to knowledge about low-tar cigarettes in 6603 male and 6751 female respondents to the GATS China survey using a structural equation modelling approach that adjusts for general knowledge about smoking using a latent variable*

Never versus current smokersPast versus current smokersPast versus never smokers
Male respondents
Latent knowledge1.2 (1.1 to 1.3)1.3 (1.1 to 1.6)1.1 (0.9 to 1.3)
Low-tar cigarettes not less harmful1.3 (1.0 to 1.7)2.1 (1.5 to 3.0)1.6 (1.1 to 2.3)
Urban residence1.0 (0.8 to 1.3)1.1 (0.8 to 1.6)1.1 (0.7 to 1.7)
Level of education
 No education1.01.01.0
 Primary0.8 (0.5 to 1.3)1.2 (0.8 to 1.7)1.5 (0.8 to 2.9)
 Secondary0.7 (0.4 to 1.1)0.8 (0.5 to 1.3)1.1 (0.2 to 2.4)
 High school0.6 (0.4 to 1.0)1.0 (0.6 to 1.6)1.6 (0.6 to 3.3)
 College1.2 (0.6 to 2.3)0.9 (0.5 to 1.7)0.7 (0.3 to 1.6)
Employment
 Farmer1.01.01.0
 Factory worker/soldier1.2 (0.9 to 1.7)1.3 (0.8 to 2.1)1.0 (0.6 to 1.6)
 Office worker1.2 (0.9 to 1.7)1.2 (0.8 to 1.7)1.0 (0.6 to 1.6)
 Doctor/teacher2.2 (1.3 to 3.6)1.8 (0.9 to 3.9)0.7 (0.2 to 2.4)
 Unemployed1.5 (1.0 to 2.1)3.0 (1.8 to 4.8)2.0 (1.2 to 3.2)
 Retired4.0 (2. 6 to 6.1)2.6 (1.6 to 4.4)0.7 (0.4 to 1.1)
Age0.98 (0.97 to 0.98)1.03 (1.02 to 1.04)1.06 (1.05 to 1.07)
Female respondents
Latent knowledge1.4 (1.0 to 1.9)1.5 (1.0 to 2.2)1.1 (0.7 to 1.6)
Low-tar cigarettes not less harmful2.8 (1.3 to 5.9)5.0 (1.3 to 20.1)1.8 (0.6 to 5.2)
Urban residence1.2 (0.6 to 2.4)0.6 (0.3 to 1.3)0.5 (0.2 to 0.9)
Level of education
 No education1.01.01.0
 Primary0.8 (0.4 to 1.3)0.7 (0.3 to 1.6)0.9 (0.5 to 1.9)
 Secondary1.0 (0.5 to 2.1)0.6 (0.2 to 1.6)0.6 (0.2 to 1.5)
 High school1.2 (0.5 to 2.7)0.6 (0.1 to 3.4)0.6 (0.1 to 2.1)
 College1.2 (0.3 to 4.3)0.9 (0.1 to 8.6)0.8 (0.1 to 4.5)
Employment†
 Farmer1.01.01.0
 Factory worker1.1 (0.5 to 2.4)1.2 (0.4 to 3.9)0.8 (0.3 to 2.5)
 Unemployed0.8 (0.4 to 1.9)1.2 (0.6 to 2.4)1.3 (0.4 to 4.5)
 Retired1.2 (0.5 to 2.9)0.8 (0.3 to 2.3)0.6 (0.2 to 2.2)
Age0.96 (0.95 to 0.97)1.02 (1.00 to 1.04)1.06 (1.04 to 1.08)
  • Values are OR (95% CI).

  • *Bold numbers indicate statistical significance at the 0.05 level.

  • †Sample sizes were too small to yield precise estimates for female office workers, doctors/teachers and students, so these results are not presented.

  • GATS, Global Adult Tobacco Survey.