Table 2

Estimated impact of graphic health warning labels using difference-in-difference models

Ln(Smoking Rate)Model 1Model 2Model 3Model 4Model 5Model 6
Canada & Post-GWL interaction−0.145***−0.163***−0.181***−0.129*−0.181**−0.219***
(0.0367)(0.0425)(0.0455)(0.0644)(0.0722)(0.0750)
Canada dummy0.229***0.137***0.128***0.3190.0405−0.0833
(0.0389)(0.0320)(0.0343)(0.290)(0.317)(0.332)
Post-GWL dummy0.00610−0.0257−0.0478−0.00430−0.0133−0.0194
(0.0332)(0.0366)(0.0385)(0.0474)(0.0550)(0.0590)
ln(Monthly Trend)−0.114***−0.101***−0.0994***−0.0972−0.120*−0.142*
(0.0175)(0.0196)(0.0216)(0.0578)(0.0667)(0.0701)
ln(Index ExciseTax)−0.172***−0.178***
(0.0450)(0.0491)
ln(PriceIndex w/o ITC Price)−0.135**−0.130*
(0.0612)(0.0649)
ln(PriceIndex w ITC Price)−0.0715−0.0623
(0.0709)(0.0732)
Canada & trend interaction−0.01970.02180.0479
(0.0628)(0.0711)(0.0746)
Constant3.511***3.540***3.573***3.429***3.631***3.769***
(0.0789)(0.0913)(0.0967)(0.274)(0.308)(0.320)
Observations292929292929
R20.9420.9210.9090.9420.9220.910
Estimated relative reduction in smoking rate in Canada13.5%15.0%16.6%12.1%16.6%19.6%
Estimated percentage point eeduction in US smoking rate (pre-2001 benchmark=23.9%)3.113.593.972.873.974.68
  • SEs in parentheses.

  • *p<0.10, **p<0.05, ***p<0.01.

  • GWL, Graphic warning labels; ITC, International Tobacco Control.