Table 5

Percentage of smokers’ cigarette packs showing evidence of possible tax avoidance or evasion: Mauritius, Uruguay, China and Bangladesh

Mauritius
Wave 1
(January–March 2005)
Wave 2
(August 2006–June 2007)
Wave 3
(January–August 2008)
Source of informationPackSelf-reportPackSelf-reportPackSelf-report
%%%%%%
No tax stamps or authenticity labels11.016.67.610.23.11.7
Don't know0.810.60.217.20.117.8
n210388335218305230
Uruguay
Wave 1
(October–December 2006)
Wave 2
(October 2008–February 2009)
Wave 3
(October 2010–January 2011)
Non-standard warning labels6.44.23.15.112.0***5.1
No warning labels4.60.63.61.88.5***5.6
Don't know0.20.00.70.83.4***3.7***
n305426361137765459
China
Wave 1
(March–December 2006)
Wave 2
(October 2007–February 2008)
Wave 3
(May 2009–March 2010)
No authenticity labels10.78.513.4*7.26.3***7.2
Don't know10.30.25.8***0.22.5***8.9***
n23081089245581725531191
Bangladesh
Wave 1 (February–May 2009)Wave 2 (March–June 2010)
No tax stamps0.4NA3.7**NA
n368NA401NA
  • n Represents the total number of valid responses per item (ie, the denominator). *, ** and ***: significant difference at 5%, 1% and 0.1% with previous time period. These should be interpreted with great caution as the number of comparisons is absurdly high.

  • NA, not applicable.