TableĀ 1

Proportion of appropriate and inappropriate claims by document category

Document categoryTotalPrivilegedPotentially privilegedNot privileged
Inconsistent claims to different Guildford Depository visitors184 (22%)6 (33%)8 (44%)
Inconsistent claims over documents with same Bates Numbers*2613 (54%)3 (11%)10 (35%)
Inconsistent claims over substantively identical documents194 (21%)2 (11%)13 (68%)
  • *For the 26 documents reviewed under this category, almost one-quarter contained redacted portions, with the material redacted often appearing to be handwritten margin notes. Redacting removed all indication of the content of the marginalia and the authors (for instance, Morales.47).