Regular ArticleReducing Smoking during Pregnancy and Postpartum: Physician's Advice Supported by Individual Counseling☆,☆☆
References (48)
- et al.
Smoking during pregnancy: reduction via objective assessment and directive advice
Behav Ther
(1991) - et al.
A randomized controlled trial of smoking cessation intervention in pregnancy in an academic clinic
Obstet Gynecol
(1996) - et al.
Effectiveness of a pregnancy smoking cessation program
J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs
(1992) - et al.
Individual smoking cessation counseling during prenatal and early postnatal care
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1994) - et al.
Exhaled carbon monoxide and urinary cotinine as measures of smoking in pregnancy
Addict Behav
(1997) - et al.
Dose-response of birth weight to various measures of maternal smoking during pregnancy
J Clin Epidemiol
(1988) - et al.
Smoking in pregnancy, exhaled carbon monoxide, and birth weight
Obstet Gynecol
(1997) - et al.
Smoking cessation in pregnancy: do effective programmes exist?
Health Promot Int
(1993) - et al.
A review of smoking in pregnancy: effects on pregnancy outcomes and cessation efforts
Annu Rev Public Health
(1993) - et al.
A meta-analysis of randomized trials of prenatal smoking cessation interventions
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1994)
A clinical trial of change in maternal smoking and its effect on birth weight
JAMA
Effect of anti-smoking health education on infant size at birth: a randomized trial
Br J Obstet Gynecol
Pregnancy and medical cost outcomes of a self-help prenatal smoking cessation program in an HMO
Public Health Rep
Randomized controlled trial of anti-smoking advice in pregnancy
Br J Prev Soc Med
A comparison of two anti-smoking interventions among pregnant women in eleven private primary care practices
J Fam Pract
A randomized evaluation of smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women at a WIC clinic
Am J Public Health
Comparison of three antismoking interventions among pregnant women in an urban setting: a randomized trial
Psychol Rep
Smoking reduction during pregnancy by a program of self-help and clinical support
Obstet Gynecol
The effectiveness of smoking cessation methods for smokers in public maternity clinics: a randomized trial
Am J Public Health
Health education for pregnant smokers: its behavioral impact and cost benefit
Am J Public Health
Stopping smoking in pregnancy: effect of a self-help manual in controlled trial
Br J Obstet Gynaecol
A randomized trial of a serialized self-help smoking cessation program for pregnant women in an HMO
Am J Public Health
Improving the delivery of prenatal care and outcomes of pregnancy: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation
Pediatrics
Cited by (50)
Changing behaviour in pregnant women: A scoping review
2020, MidwiferyCitation Excerpt :Of these, 22 were conducted in high-income countries (Baker, 2011; Boyd and Windsor, 2003; Bryce et al., 2009; Carter et al., 1989; Crawford-Williams et al., 2016; Currie et al., 2015; El-Mohandes et al., 2011; Gaston and Prapavessis, 2014; Gesell et al., 2015; Hayman et al., 2017; Herring et al., 2017; Hill et al., 2016; Hughes et al., 2017; Kendall et al., 2017; Naughton et al., 2015; Olson et al., 2018; Osterman et al., 2014; Poston et al., 2013; Secker-Walker et al., 1998; Wilkinson and McIntyre, 2012; Wilkinson et al., 2010; Windsor et al., 2014). The most frequent study design was a randomised control trial, applied in 17 studies (Al Kahmis et al., 2017; Boyd and Windsor, 2003; Carter et al., 1989; Crawford-Williams et al., 2016; Currie et al., 2015; El-Mohandes et al., 2011; Gaston and Prapavessis, 2014; Gesell et al., 2015; Hayman et al., 2017; Herring et al., 2017; Hughes et al., 2017; Olson et al., 2018; Osterman et al., 2014; Poston et al., 2013; Rasouli et al., 2017; Secker-Walker et al., 1998; Wilkinson and McIntyre, 2012), followed by five quasi-experimental studies (Arefi et al., 2015; Hill et al., 2016; Shivalli et al., 2015; Wilkinson et al., 2010; Windsor et al., 2014), three controlled studies with (Kendall et al., 2017; Khan et al., 2013) or without (Naughton et al., 2015) a control group, one observational study without a control group (Baker, 2011), one action research study without a control group (Bryce et al., 2009), one mixed-method study (Lau et al., 2014), one effectiveness study without a control group (Villadsen et al., 2016), and one post-hoc evaluation (Kaufman et al., 2017). The most frequent study setting was the United States (n = 11), followed by Australia (n = 5).
A proactive smoking cessation intervention in postpartum women
2013, MidwiferyCitation Excerpt :Our results indicate that a proactive intervention during the postpartum may increase the probability of abstinence in those who stopped smoking during pregnancy and promotes progress in the behavioural process of change in those women who continued to smoke during pregnancy. Several previous studies that evaluated interventions during the postpartum obtained contradictory results, partly due to the different methodologies used for the design and the characteristics of the intervention (Secker-Walker et al., 1998; Mullen, 2004; Solomon and Quinn, 2004; Goldenberg et al., 2000). These differences include the intensity of the intervention (from self-help materials to visits) (Levitt et al., 2007; Hannöver et al., 2009), the staff who run it (paediatricians, midwives, nurses) (Severson et al., 1997; Hajek et al., 2001; Petersen et al., 2009) or the follow-up and the evaluation of the results, which vary from biochemical validation of abstinence to self-reported status (Secker-Walker et al., 1998; McBride et al., 1999; Valanis et al., 2001).
The Effect of Preconception Counselling on Lifestyle and Other Behaviour Before and During Pregnancy
2008, Women's Health IssuesRecruiting pregnant smokers into a clinical trial: Using a network-model managed care organization versus community-based practices
2007, Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :As novel recruitment strategies are identified, it will be important to understand which subgroups of pregnant smokers enroll and what types of interventions work best for different subgroups. Clinical trials testing smoking cessation methods for pregnant women have generally recruited participants directly from prenatal care delivery sites (Malchodi et al., 2003; Donatelle et al., 2000; Gielen et al., 1997; Ferreira-Borges, 2005; Hartmann et al., 1996; Price et al., 1991; Secker-Walker et al., 1994, 1998; Windsor et al., 1993, 1985; Ershoff et al., 1999; McBride et al., 1999). Most studies have used a proactive strategy in which pregnant women presenting for prenatal care were systematically screened for smoking status and trial eligibility, often using on-site research staff.
- ☆
Support for this study was provided by the National Institutes of Health, Grants HL29957 and CA22435. This study was initiated and analyzed solely by the investigators.
- ☆☆
We are most grateful to the late Sandra S. Lepage, M.S.N., for all she did to help intervention group participants change their smoking behavior. We also thank Jane E. Crammond, R.N., for enrolling women into this study and conducting the interviews.
- 2
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed at 1 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05401. Fax: (802) 656-8826. E-mail:[email protected].