Abstract
The attribution of responsibility to victims of bad fate (“blaming the victim”) is discussed under the perspective of Just World Theory (Lerner, 1980) and the Defensive Attribution Hypothesis (Walster, 1966; Shaver, 1970). Whereas Just World Theory suggests that the belief in a just world is the decisive motive of increased attributions of responsibility, the Defensive Attribution Hypothesis assumes that these attributions are motivated by the need to believe in internal locus of control. Research evidence shows both motives as conceptually linked and empirically correlated. The central question is whether belief in a just world and belief in internal control are facets of the same latent variable or empirically distinguishable constructs, and whether they contribute independently to attributions of responsibility and blame to victims of misfortune. Results of a questionnaire study assessing opinions about cancer and cancer victims are reported. There is evidence from factor analyses that the two motives are indeed distinguishable constructs. The correlation patterns and the results of multiple regression analyses show that both motives are meaningfully related to attributions of responsibility. Moreover, it is suggested that belief in a just world is not a homogeneous construct. Belief in immanent justice according to which present misfortune is seen as a consequence of prior faults and sins is differentiated from belief in ultimate justice according to which one can be sure that present misfortune will be compensated in the long run. Whereas belief in immanent justice is the most important predictor for attributions of responsibility, the suggested emotional consequences of such attributions, like belief in invulnerability or confidence in coping, can be predicted by belief in internal control and belief in ultimate justice. Finally, suggestions are made to extend Just World Theory to clarify the function of justice motives in the person's search for meaning in his or her life.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, C. S. (1980). The responsible victim: Nurses' perceptions of victims of rape.J. Health Soc. Behav. 21: 22–33.
Anthony, S. (1976). The attribution of responsibility for the outcome of an interpersonal interaction.J. Psychol. 93: 85–91.
Bloch, E. (1980).Das Prinzip Hoffnung, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.
Bridges, J. S., and McGrail, C. A. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for date and stranger rape.Sex Roles 21: 273–286.
Broussard, S. D., and Wagner, W. G. (1988). Child sexual abuse: Who is to blame?Child Abuse Neglect 12: 563–569.
Bulman, R. J., and Wortman, C. B. (1977). Attributions of blame and coping in the “real world”: Severe accident victims react to their lot.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35: 351–363.
Burger, J. M. (1981). Motivational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: a meta-analysis of the Defensive-Attribution Hypothesis.Psychol. Bull. 90: 496–512.
Collins, B. E. (1974). Four components of the Rotter Internal-External scale: Belief in a difficult world, a just world, a predictable world, and a politically responsive world.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 29: 381–391.
Connors, G. J., Ranish, S. S., and Maisto, S. A. (1982). Alcohol and victim compensation as determinants of responsibility attribution in traffic accidents.J. Stud. Alcohol 43: 1251–1256.
Fleming, J. S., and Spooner, P. S. (1985). Five factor scales for internal-external control and their relations to measures of adjustment.J. Clin. Psychol. 41: 512–517.
Furnham, A., and Procter, E. (1992). Sphere-specific just world beliefs and attitudes to AIDS.Hum. Rel. 45: 265–280.
Gleason, J. M., and Harris, V. A. (1976). Perceived freedom, accident severity and empathic value as determinants of the attribution of responsibility.Soc. Behav. Pers. 4: 171–176.
Herbst, E. (1992). Zuschreibungen von Verantwortlichkeit und Schuld gegenüber Opfern durch unbeteiligte Dritte in ihrer Abhängigkeit von Gerechtigkeits- und Kontrollierbarkiets-überzeugungen sowie Gerechtigkeits- und Kontrollierbarkeits-zentralität. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Universität Trier.
Kaemmerer, W. F., and Schwebel, A. I. (1976). Factors of the Rotter Internal-External Scale.Psychol. Rep. 39: 107–114.
Kordmann, P. (1991). Determinanten der Opferbeurteilung. Einflüsse von Gerechtigkeits- und Kontrollierbarkeitsüberzeugungen auf den Attributionsprozeβ. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Universität Trier.
Langley, T., Yost, E. A., O'Neal, E. C., Taylor, S. L.,et al. (1991). Models of rape judgment: Attributions concerning event, perpetrator, and victim.J. Offender Rehabil. 17: 43–54.
Lerner, M. J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer's reward and attractiveness.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1: 355–360.
Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive in social behavior. Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms.J. Pers. 45: 1–52.
Lerner, M. J. (1978). ... but nobody liked the Indians. “Belief in a just world” versus the “Authoritarianism” syndrome.Ethnicity 5: 229–237.
Lerner, M. J. (1980).Belief in a Just World. A Fundamental Delusion. Plenum Press, New York.
Lerner, M. J., and Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead.Psychol. Bull. 85: 1030–1051.
Lerner, M. J., and Simmons, C. H. (1966). The observer's reaction to the “innocent victim”: compassion or rejection?J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 4: 203–210.
Levenson, H. (1972). Distinctions within the concept of internal- external control: Development of a new scale. Proceedings of the 80th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, pp. 261–262.
Lipkus, I. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale.Pers. Indiv. Diff. 12: 1171–1178.
Miller, D. T. (1977). Altruism and threat to the belief in a just world.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 13: 113–126.
Montada, L. (1986). Life stress, injustice, and the question: “Who is responsible?” In Steensma, H., and Vermunt, G. (ed.),Justice in Human Relations, Plenum Press, New York.
Montada, L. (1991). Attribution of responsibility for losses and perceived injustice. In Montada, L., Filipp, S.-H., and Lerner, M. J. (ed.), Life Crises and the Experience of Loss in Adulthood, Lawrence Eribaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Montada, L., Schmitt, M., and Dalbert, C. (1986). Thinking about justice and dealing with one's own privileges: A study on existential guilt. In Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R., and Greenberg, J. (eds.), Justice in Social Relations, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 125–143.
Piaget, J. (1983).Le Jugement Moral Chez L'enfant, Alcan, Paris.
Rim, Y. (1981). Who believes in graphology?Pers. Indiv. Diff. 2: 85–87.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychol. Mongr. 80 (Whole No. 608): pp. 1–28.
Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1973). Belief in a just world and reactions to another's lot: A study of participants in the National Draft Lottery.J. Soc. Issues 29: 73–93.
Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world?J. Soc. Issues 31 (3): 65–90.
Ryan, W. (1971).Blaming the Victim, Pantheon, New York.
Sadow, D. (1983). Irrational attributions of responsibility: Who, what, when, and why.Psychol. Rep. 52: 403–406.
Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 14: 101–113.
Skinner, E., Chapman, M., and Baltes, P. B. (1988). Control, means-ends, and agency beliefs: A new conceptualization and its measurement during childhood.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54: 117–133.
Sontag, S. (1979).Illness as a Metaphor, Vintage, New York.
Sosis, R. H. (1974). Internal-external control and the perception of responsibility of another for an accident.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 30: 393–399.
Thornton, B., Ryckman, R. M., and Robbins, M. A. (1982). The relationships of observer characteristics to beliefs in the causal responsibility of victims of sexual assault.Hum. Rel. 35: 321–330.
Ugwuegbu, D. C., and Hendrick, C. (1974). Personal causality and attribution of responsibility.Soc. Behav. Pers. 2: 76–86.
Valentine-French, S., and Radtke, H. L. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for an incident of sexual harassment in a university setting.Sex Roles 21: 545–555.
Vallacher, R. R., and Selz, K. (1991). Who's to blame? Action identification in allocating responsibility for alleged rape.Soc. Cognit. 9: 194–219.
Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 3: 73–79.
Witt, L. A. (1989). Urban-nonurban differences in social cognition: Locus of control and perceptions of a just world.J. Soc. Psychol. 129: 715–717.
Zuckerman, M., and Gerbasi, K. C. (1977). Belief in internal control or belief in a just world: The use and misuse of the I-E-scale in prediction of attitudes and behavior.J. Pers. 45: 356–378.
Zuckerman, M., Gerbasi, K. C., and Marion, S. P. (1977). Correlates of the just world factor of Rotter's I-E Scale.Educ. Psychol. Measur. 37: 375–381.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maes, J. Blaming the victim: Belief in control or belief in justice?. Soc Just Res 7, 69–90 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333823
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333823