Skip to main content
Log in

Unhealthy Partnerships: The Tobacco Industry and African American and Latino Labor Organizations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tobacco industry in the 1980s began to form relationships with outside groups for assistance on key policy issues due to its own poor credibility in the policy arena. This strategy allowed the industry to advance its own interests while seeming to match the agendas of very different organizations. Between 1988 and 1998, the tobacco industry developed coalitions with the A. Philip Randolph Institute (APRI), representing African American trade unionists, and the Labor Coalition on Latin American Advancement (LCLAA), representing Latino trade unionists. APRI and LCLAA each adopted resolutions supporting industry positions on smokefree worksites and excise taxes, issues on which they had not previously taken positions, and promoted these positions to their members, political leaders and the public. They also supported the industry’s youth programs. This research relied upon a review of background literature and document searches through the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library and Tobacco Documents Online to examine the development of the excise tax coalition. The tobacco industry built support with APRI and LCLAA by framing policy positions in line with the organizations’ interests, creating institutional arrangements that circumvented direct funding from the industry, and enhancing the industry’s ability to influence excise tax debates indirectly. Although tobacco control advocates do not have the financial resources of the tobacco industry at their disposal, they can learn from tobacco industry techniques as they seek to build coalitions with people of color in the labor movement. Tobacco control advocates can both counter tobacco industry issue frames and also align their interests with those of working people of color by working on other issues of interest to this population, including health care and worker health and safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaiser Family Foundation. Number of cancer deaths per 100,000 population by––race/ethnicity. 2004. http://www.statehealthfacts.org/comparebar.jsp?ind=69&cat=2. Accessed 13 Aug 2008.

  2. Tobacco Use Among U.S. Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups, African Americans, American Indians and Alaska Natives, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, Latinos. A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1998.

  3. Lisovicz N, et al. The deep South Network for cancer control: building a community infrastructure to reduce cancer health disparities. Cancer Suppl. 2006;107:1971–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jandorf L, et al. Creating alliances to improve cancer prevention and detection among urban medically underserved minority groups: the East Harlem partnership for cancer awareness. Cancer Suppl. 2006;107:2043–51.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Powe B. Eliminating cancer disparities. Cancer Suppl. 2007;109:345–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Savarese J. Labor management committee activities, November 1993 to April 1994. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1994. 512541899/1902.

  7. Stuntz SM. Executive committee remarks––FET/health care. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1993. TICT0005308/5320.

  8. Tobacco Institute. Final 1999 industry labor management committee budget. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1999. 2065484579.

  9. Tobacco Institute. Tobacco industry labor management committee: an overview and look toward 1999. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1999. 2075023997/4004.

  10. Tobacco Institute. The Tobacco institute public affairs division proposed budget and operating plan 1986. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1998. 506785512/5528.

  11. Tobacco Institute. 1998 proposed budget. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1997. 580095226.

  12. Tobacco Institute. Tobacco Industry labor management committee. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1995. 518257962.

  13. Tobacco Institute. TILMC proposed 1995 budget. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1994. 2025726941.

  14. Tobacco Institute. Labor management committee budget proposals. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1994. 93795123.

  15. Tobacco Institute. Tobacco institute contribution to tobacco industry labor management committee. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1994. TICT0002814.

  16. Tobacco Institute. Proposed tobacco industry labor management committee 1994 budget. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1993. TICT002789.

  17. Tobacco Institute. 1993 budget. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1992. TI16681184.

  18. Tobacco Institute. 1992 budget. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1991. 91085893.

  19. Tobacco Institute. Excise taxes. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1991. TI16681351/1355.

  20. Tobacco Institute. 1991 budget. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1990. TI16681462/1658.

  21. Tobacco Institute. The tobacco institute 1991 budget: excise taxes. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1990. TIMN382431.

  22. Tobacco Institute. 1990 budget. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1990. TI51451557/1561.

  23. Seymour ML. Re: APRI meeting with norm hill and staff. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1991. TIMN 0205339/5341.

  24. Stuntz SM. Memorandum. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1991. TI00930670/0671.

  25. Dawson L, Kaiser H. Labor Council for Latin American advancement eighth national membership meeting, July 18–22, 1990. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1990. TIILBC0010955/0956.

  26. Seymour ML. LCLAA meeting with Jack Otero. In: UCSF Legacy Library; Feb. 1991.

  27. Dawson L, Carey J. April 7 meeting with Jack Otero. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1992. TIMN0379016/9017.

  28. Heclo H. Ideas, Interests, and Institutions. In: Dodd L, Jillson C, editors. The dynamics of american politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1994. p. 366–95.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stuntz SM. Labor presentation to the communications committee. In: Tobacco Documents On-Line; 1988. TCAL0060863/0931.

  30. Balbach E, et al. Political coalitions for mutual advantage: the case of the tobacco industry’s Labor management committee. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:985–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Balbach E, Herzberg A, Barbeau E. Political coalitions and working women: how the tobacco industry built a relationship with the Coalition of Labor Union Women. J Epi Comm Health Suppl. 2;60:ii27–32

  32. Levy D, et al. The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: a tobacco control scorecard. J Public Health Manage Pract. 2004;10:338–53.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chilcote S. Memorandum. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1987. TIDN 0002799/2803.

  34. Pfeffer P, Philip Randolph A. Pioneer of the civil rights movement. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Korstad R. Civil rights unionism: tobacco workers and the struggle for democracy in the mid-twentieth-century south. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jones W. Simple truths of democracy: African Americans and organized labor in the post-world war II south. In: Arnesen E, editor. The Black worker: a reader. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press; 2007. p. 250–70.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bates B. Mobilizing Black Chicago: the brotherhood of sleeping car porters and community organizing, 1925–35. In: Arnesen E, editor. The Black worker: a reader. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press; 2007. p. 195–221.

    Google Scholar 

  38. A. Philip Randolph Institute. www.apri.org. Accessed 3 Aug 2008.

  39. Labor Council for Latin American Advancement. http://www.lclaa.org/about.html. Accessed 3 Aug 2008.

  40. Labor Council for Latin American Advancement. Declaration of principles & national by-laws. http://www.lclaa.org/constitution.html. Accessed 6 Aug 2008.

  41. Stuntz SM. Meeting with the youth consortium, family COURSE. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1991. TI00930973/0974.

  42. Dawson L. April 29 meeting with Jack Otero. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1992. TIMN0383188/3189.

  43. Dawson L, Donahue T, Kaiser H. LCLAA board meeting presentation. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1988. TITX0023591/3592.

  44. Tobacco Institute. Public affairs management plan progress report, August 1988. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1988. TIDN0018350.

  45. Covington & Burling. OSHA RFI filings: period from 920122 to 920123. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1992. 2024702849/2851.

  46. Center for Science in the Public Interest. Letter to lane Adams. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1984. TIMN 0140814/0817.

  47. Tobacco Institute. Public affairs management plan progress report. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1988. TIDN 0018389/8431.

  48. Tobacco Institute. Executive summary. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1987. 506772358/2359.

  49. Tobacco Institute. Tax presentation Philip Morris briefing. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1990. T159451495/1524.

  50. Tobacco Institute. Repackage 1989 materials using 1990 issues e.g. peace. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1990. TI02090434/0445.

  51. Ogilvy Adams & Rinehart. Promotional plan for release of APRI Study. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1992. TI16790031/0032.

  52. Tobacco Institute. Public affairs management progress report. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1992. TIMN 0344202/4236.

  53. Letters to the Editor––FET. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1992. 512692912/3032.

  54. Stuntz SM. Memorandum. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1992. TIMN0364206/4207.

  55. Tobacco Institute. Consumer excise taxes and African-Americans. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1992. 2070038529.

  56. Briefing Book: Tobacco taxes and health care financing. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1994. 522570001/0145.

  57. Stuntz SM. Memorandum. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1990. TIFL0526894.

  58. Stuntz SM. Letter to Norm Hill. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1990. TIMN0443674/3675.

  59. Landman A, et al. Tobacco industry youth smoking prevention programs: protecting the industry and hurting tobacco control. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:917–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. DiFranza J, McAfee T. The Tobacco institute: helping youth say “yes” to tobacco. J Fam Pract. 1992;35:694.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tobacco Institute. Public Affairs management plan progress report September 1992 In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1992. TIMN0344311/4350.

  62. Tobaccotalk. Tobacco and education groups form partnership to produce youth decide. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1984. TIMN0208230.

  63. AFL-CIO policy rejects anti-smoking campaigns. BC&T News 1980; Sect. 1.

  64. Labor Council for Latin American Advancement. LCLAA legislative platform. http://www.lclaa.org/legislative.html. Accessed 3 Aug 2008.

  65. A. Philip Randolph Institute. What APRI represents. http://www.apri.org/ht/d/sp/i/237/pid/237. Accessed 3 Aug 2008.

  66. King G, et al. African Americans’ attitudes toward cigarette excise taxes. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:828–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funded by NCI Grant R01CA095964. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Campbell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raebeck, A., Campbell, R. & Balbach, E. Unhealthy Partnerships: The Tobacco Industry and African American and Latino Labor Organizations. J Immigrant Minority Health 12, 228–233 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-009-9269-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-009-9269-0

Keywords

Navigation